Energy of 2 spherical shells filled with dielectric

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving two concentric conducting spherical shells with charges +Q and -Q, separated by a dielectric material with a varying permittivity. The user successfully derived the displacement field and electric field between the shells using Gauss's law and related equations. Confusion arose regarding the volume bound charge, which was found to depend on the radial distance r, prompting questions about potential errors in the calculations. After clarification, it was confirmed that the volume bound charge's sign was incorrect, leading to the realization that the total bound charges cancel out, resulting in no electric field outside the outer shell. This understanding allowed the user to complete the remaining parts of the problem.
phys-student
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


2 concentric conducting spherical shells, with radii a and 2a, have charge +Q and -Q respectively. The space between the shells is filled with a linear dielectric with permittivity ε(r) = (ε0*a)/(1.5*a - 0.5*r), which varies with distance r.
a) Use Gauss's law to determine the displacement field between the shells
b) Determine the bound surface and volume charge between the shells
c) Determine the total energy of the system
d) Determine the capacitance

Homework Equations


D = ε0E+P
D = εE

The Attempt at a Solution


I already did part a and got the following equation for D:
D = Q/4πr2 in the radial direction
For part b I rearranged the equation, D=εE to get an expression for E which was:
E=(Q(1.5a-0.5r))/4πr2ε0a in the radial direction
Then I used the equation D = ε0E+P to solve for P, giving me the following:
P=(Q/4πr2)(1 - ((1.5a - 0.5r)/a)) in the radial direction
Now that I had an expression for P I tried to find the surface and volume bound charge, this is where my confusion starts. For the volume bound charge I found the negative of the divergence of P and ended up getting an expression that depended on r.
Volume bound charge = Q/8πar2
It doesn't make sense to me that the volume bound charge depends on r so now I'm wondering if I did something wrong when I found the expression for P. Can anyone tell me if I've made a mistake somewhere? The other question that I have is regarding part c, is there an electric field outside the outer sphere because of the bound charges? The charge from the 2 spherical shells cancel out so Gauss's law should give 0 field outside the outer shell, but if the bound charge contributes to the field then it will be non-zero and I'll have to include it in my calculation of the total energy. Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why does it bother you that there is a volume charge density that varies with r?

Your work looks good except you might want to check the sign of the volume bound charge.

Regarding whether there is a field outside the outer conductor, have you accounted for all the charge? There is free charge on the conductors and there is bound volume charge within the dielectric. But there is also some additional charge that you have not yet taken into account.
 
  • Like
Likes phys-student
If you mean the surface bound charge on the outer surface when you say I haven't accounted for all the charge yet, then I already found that. Thanks for pointing out the sign of the volume bound charge, I found the spot where I missed a minus sign. Now it seems that the total volume bound charge and the surface bound charge on the outer surface cancel out so there is no electric field outside the sphere and I was able to complete the rest of the question.
 
OK. Good work.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top