Energy of an oscillating spring

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the energy dynamics of an oscillating spring attached to a weight. At the lowest point of oscillation, all energy is elastic potential energy, while at the equilibrium point, the energy is a mix of kinetic and gravitational potential energy. The conversation highlights that both extension and compression of the spring store elastic potential energy, which is calculated using the formula U = 1/2 kx^2, where x is the distance from equilibrium. It is clarified that the elastic potential energy at the top of the motion is not equal to that at the bottom due to the influence of gravity, which affects the net forces acting on the mass. Ultimately, the conservation of energy principle is upheld, with gravitational potential energy accounting for the differences in elastic potential energy at various points in the oscillation.
qazxsw11111
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
Ok, so I got a spring attached to a weight and positioned on the eqm point. So I displace it a little and it undergoes oscillation.

At the lowest point, everything is Elastic Potential Energy since extension is maximum.

At the eqm point, extension=0 so it is just a mixture of KE and GPE.

At the top, there is 0 KE, maximum GPE. But what about the Elastic Potential energy? Does the hooke's law extension formula includes 'compression'? Is there 'compression energy'?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, there is. The spring imparts a restoring force, and there is potential energy in this; if the spring is compressed, there is energy stored that can be used to accelerate (think in the pinball machine, how you shoot the ball). If the spring is extended, there is energy in that it wants to restore an attached object to equilibrium.

The potential energy is the same in either case, and is dependent only on the distance x from equilibrium (in either direction):

U = \frac{1}{2}kx^2
 
Ok thanks. So the energy at the top is not purely GPE (although it is at maximum compared to other positions) but also maximum EPE (since maximum extension/compression)?

But what about conservation of energy?

Bottom: Elastic PE(max)
Top:Elastic PE(max)+GPE(max)

Im still quite confused lol.
 
Well, let's take a minute and think about what's going on here, when you factor in gravity. The spring itself exerts a force on the attached mass-- upwards, if the mass is below equilibrium (spring is extended), and downwards, if the mass is above equilibrium (spring is compressed). Gravity, however, exerts a force downwards, always. So what's the net result? You get more force going down than you get going up. What does this mean in terms of motion of the mass? It means that it extends further from equilibrium at the downward portion, than it does when it compresses upwards (because of gravity).

So when you say Elastic PE(max), you have to note that the Elastic potential energy at the top of the motion is not equal to the elastic potential energy at the bottom (because of gravity).

Where does the extra energy go/come from? You guessed it, the gravitational potential energy. Energy is conserved.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top