Energy required to bend an elastic rod

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the energy conservation principle in bending an elastic rod into a loop. It posits that the work done during the bending process is stored in the rod, which can be released when the rod returns to its original shape. Participants are seeking a formula to calculate the energy required to bend a rod based on its elasticity. The comparison to a leaf spring highlights the practical application of these concepts. Understanding the energy dynamics is crucial for both theoretical and practical applications in materials science.
diagopod
Messages
96
Reaction score
3
Thinking in terms of the conservation of energy, it seems to make sense that if you took a relatively elastic rod with hooks on either end, so that it could be bent all the way around and made to hook to itself (and make a loop), that the energy required to bend it into a closed loop would be put into the rod. So essentially the work done in bending the rod into a loop would be found in the rod after the act of bending it into a loop (and hooking it to itself) was over? And that same energy would be released when the loop was unhooked and allowed to return to its natural straight length again?

Does anyone know what formula one would use to determine the energy required to bend a rod of a given elasticity into a loop? Of course, keeping it as a loop of course is another question entirely that I'm not as concerned with.

Thanks for any help or guidance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This thing is similar to a common leaf spring.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top