Energy Tensor & Field Equation | Einstein Theory

shubham agn
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hello!

The Einstein field equation relates the curvature of space-time to the energy tensor of mass-energy. This is fine. These field equations are derived by varying the Hilbert action. Now the Hilbert action is an integral of scalar curvature (R) over volume. So, when we vary this action, we must get the energy tensor of the field. How then do we naively take this to be the energy tensor of mass-energy and claim to have derived the field equation?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Varying the EH action alone, gives you the field equations in the absence of sources. But when you vary the action ##S_{tot}=S_{EH}+S_{m} ## ,where ## S_{m}## is the action for any matter or non-gravitational field, there will be an RHS term resulting from the variation of ##S_m## w.r.t. metric which we define to be the SEM tensor of those fields or particles. This definition of SEM tensor turns out to be compatible with other areas of physics.
 
As Shyan has already stated, one needs to account for the Lagrangian of matter fields while minimizing the Einstein-Hilbert action to obtain a useful equation. The variation of this Lagrangian with respect to the metric is by definition proportional to the stress-energy tensor associated with the matter affecting spacetime:
##T_{μν} = \frac {-2 \delta L}{\delta g^{μν}} + g_{μν} L## (L= lagrangian describing matter fields)
So when we're deriving the EFE, what we're actually doing is setting the action ##S## equal to ## \int ( \frac{R}{2α} + L) \sqrt{-g} d^4 x## and varying the entire integrand with respect to the metric tensor, where ##α## is a constant which is set equal to ##8πG## so that GR reduces to Newtonian gravity ##∇^2 Φ = 4πGρ## when velocities are much lower than ##1## and gravitational curvature is small enough for it to be considered as a perturbation of flat Minkowski space.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top