Energy travels at group velocity and not phase velocity?

AI Thread Summary
Energy travels at group velocity rather than phase velocity, as group velocity represents the speed at which the envelope of a wave packet moves, correlating with energy transfer. However, it is important to note that group velocity does not always equate to the speed of energy transfer in all scenarios. A general proof supporting this concept can be found in a referenced paper discussing the equivalence of group velocity and energy transport. The discussion emphasizes the need to understand the conditions under which group velocity accurately reflects energy movement. Overall, the relationship between group velocity and energy transfer is complex and context-dependent.
zebanaqvi
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
How to prove that energy travels at group velocity and not phase velocity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_velocity

Note that the group velocity is not always the speed for energy transfer!

A general proof is given in this paper: http://journals.aps.org/archive/abstract/10.1103/PhysRev.105.1129
"General Theorems on the Equivalence of Group Velocity and Energy Transport"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top