Energy when going down the escalator

  • Thread starter Thread starter dawn_pingpong
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
AI Thread Summary
When descending an escalator, a person loses gravitational potential energy, which raises questions about where this energy goes. The escalator performs work to lower the individual, indicating that energy is also expended by the escalator itself. The discussion explores the balance of energy transformation, suggesting that potential energy may convert into heat and sound during the descent. It considers scenarios where the escalator operates with varying loads, affecting its energy dynamics. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the complexities of energy transfer in a constant-speed escalator system.
dawn_pingpong
Messages
47
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hello, I was just thinking about this when going down the escalator today... When one goes down the escalator, one loses potential energy, and work is done by the escalator to bring you down. In a sense, energy is lost from the escalator too (as it does work). Taking that the escalator speed remains constant throughout the ride, where has your gravitational potential energy go to?

Yes, in a sense, when one portion of the escalator moves down (the front exposed part), another part is transported back to the surface through the space underneath the escalator. However, as the front part goes down, the bottom (which is supposedly of equivalent mass etc, as it is a roller) moves upwards, which should perfectly balance itself, which means all of your potential energy were transformed to heat and sound etc? But this really doesn't seem right...

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try to consider two situations: the load is less than or just enough to let the escalator "free wheel" (i.e., work with zero electric input) and the load is greater than that.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top