Engineering Dynamics: Connected Systems

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a dynamics problem involving a uniform bar supported by springs and a damper, with an emphasis on determining the equivalent mass-spring-damping system at point A and calculating the system's natural frequency. Participants suggest that moving the mass and spring from point F to D may not yield the correct solution, advocating instead for developing a displacement relationship among all points. There is also a query regarding how to handle the torsional spring at pivot B and whether it can be converted into a linear spring constant. Additionally, some inconsistencies between the written description and the accompanying diagram are noted, indicating potential errors in the problem statement. The conversation highlights the complexity of connected systems in engineering dynamics and the importance of accurate modeling.
VonDanglewanger
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A uniform bar ABCD having a mass of 4.25kg is pivoted at B shown in Figure below. The bar ABCD is
supported at A and D by springs having stiffness’s of 12kN/m and 2kN/m respectively. A torsional spring
of stiffness 100Nm/rad is also present at the pivot B and a damper is located at C having a coefficient of
damping of 6kNs/m. A discrete mass of 6.75kg is at D. Beam ABCD is connected to another beam EFG by
Link DG. The Link has negligible mass. Beam EFG is also uniform and has a mass of 7.1kg/m and is pivoted
at E and carries a mass of 8kg and a spring of stiffness 10kN/m at F. Determine:

(a) the equivalent mass-spring-damping system at A;
(b) the natural frequency of the system.

upload_2014-10-20_11-28-13.png


My thoughts at a solution involve moving the mass and spring from F to D to find the equivalent mass-spring system at D. I would then calculate the equivalent mass of lever EFG, which I believe would be transmitted through lever DG to point D. Adding the equivalent mass of lever EFG to the mass at D would give me a new value for the equivalent mass at D which means I could treat the whole thing as a linear system and work back from D referring everything to point A as instructed.

Question: Does this appear to be a logical solution? What do I do about the torsional spring at pivot B, can I somehow convert it into a linear spring constant?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The way you state it doesn't sound correct.

For example, I am not entirely sure what you mean by "moving the mass and spring from F to D". If you literally mean this then I don't think this will give you the correct answer.

The correct approach I think would be to develop a displacement relationship between all the points.

BTW, there appear to be some typos in the written description since it doesn't match the diagram 100%.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K