Engineering Physics, Diff EQ, Matrix Algebra - too hard?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges and experiences related to taking Engineering Physics, Differential Equations, and Matrix Algebra concurrently at the University of Washington. Participants share their perspectives on the difficulty of these courses, particularly in the context of engineering studies.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses skepticism about managing all three courses simultaneously, citing past difficulties with a calculus class due to language barriers with the instructor.
  • Several participants suggest that taking three courses is manageable, with one noting that it is considered an easy semester.
  • Some participants characterize the math courses as primarily computational, indicating that time management will be crucial for success.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of Matrix Algebra, with one participant questioning whether it is mostly "cookbook" math, while another highlights the proof-based approach required for physicists.
  • Experiences with Physics 2 are shared, with mixed feelings about its difficulty and relevance to engineering majors, particularly Electrical Engineering.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential for failing exams in physics classes, with mentions of grade curving practices at UW.
  • Advice is given regarding the importance of homework and utilizing recitation sessions for better understanding.
  • One participant notes that their experience with Matrix Algebra was rigorous and proof-based, contrasting with others' views on its computational nature.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the manageability of the courses and the nature of Matrix Algebra, indicating that there is no consensus on the overall difficulty or approach to these subjects.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention varying experiences with course difficulty based on teaching quality and personal interest in the subjects, highlighting the subjective nature of their assessments.

Who May Find This Useful

Students considering similar coursework in engineering or those interested in the experiences of peers regarding course difficulty and management strategies.

Huskyguy
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hello, I am currently signed up for Fall Quarter Engineering Physics, Diff EQ, and Matrix algebra at the University of Washington.

Right now I am sort of skeptical if I should drop one of these classes because I have heard horror stories from at least one of each of these classes. I got a B- in calc 2 and A- in calc 1. I understand integration pretty well, but my teacher didn't speak any English at all, so I completely bombed a couple of the tests.

Is taking all of these together suicide? Keep in mind that I MUST stay in physics.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


3 courses is considered a very easy semester
 


UW goes on a quarter system
 


That seems very manageable.
 


In terms of math, those are PRETTY much computational classes, so they might take some time, but overall you should be fine if you can manage your time well.
 


I took Physics 2 last year, which is really more geared towards Electrical Engineers...and it was my toughest class, I hated it, because it really was not of any interest and didn't have much to do with my degree, other two shouldn't be too bad...I am not sure what your school's "Engineering Physics" is...probably torque and all that good stuff. That stuff is actually interesting and good for your degree
 


romsofia said:
In terms of math, those are PRETTY much computational classes, so they might take some time, but overall you should be fine if you can manage your time well.

By computational, do you mean they are mostly "cookbook" plug-and-chug type math? I have been reading into Matrix Algebra a little bit and it seems terribly tedious, but after reading into Diff EQ, it seems more straight forward; just lots of integration. Was Matrix Algebra hard for you?
 


C268 said:
I took Physics 2 last year, which is really more geared towards Electrical Engineers...and it was my toughest class, I hated it, because it really was not of any interest and didn't have much to do with my degree, other two shouldn't be too bad...I am not sure what your school's "Engineering Physics" is...probably torque and all that good stuff. That stuff is actually interesting and good for your degree

My physics class is considered the first physics in the calculus based physics series - It is titled "Mechanics" and geared for engineers and scientists. I am majoring in Electrical Engineering, so that information is good/scary to hear. From what I have heard most of the physics classes at UW have to curved because so many people fail the exams. =(
 
Last edited:


romsofia said:
In terms of math, those are PRETTY much computational classes, so they might take some time, but overall you should be fine if you can manage your time well.

I would have to disagree about the matrix algebra class, at least compared to my experience. At uvic, there are 2 matrix algebra/linear algebra courses, one is geared towards the engineers and IS primarily applied linear algebra, but the one that is required for physicists is very proof-based and lays down the foundational theory quite rigorously.
 
  • #10


Huskyguy said:
My physics class is considered the first physics in the calculus based physics series - It is titled "Mechanics" and geared for engineers and scientists. I am majoring in Electrical Engineering, so that information is good/scary to hear. From what I have heard most of the physics classes at UW have to curved because so many people fail the exams. =(

hahaha soooo true. Physics 1 isn't too bad, Physics 2 was tough, it could have been my teacher though...my advice do the homework and don't slack off...if there is a recitation for the class TAKE IT - this is a MUST. I am lucky to have a friend who is ridiculously smart so he helped me out a lot. Some of the exams were filled with just stupid questions I had never seen, most were conceptual questions where you really have to think. The final exam wasn't too bad I think I got a 78% on it which for that class is amazing haha. Thankfully I am done with all my "basics" sort of classes like Calc 1, Calc 2, Chemistry, Physics 1, and Physics 2, as well as a Solidworks class and general Engineering class - some other classes as well. I am entering the true engineering classes this year, starting classes on Monday. I have Statics which I hear is really tough, so we will see how it goes. My understanding is once your past Thermodynamics, Fluids, and Statics your pretty set. I believe I take all those this year. Of course, those are for Mechanical Engineering so chances are you won't take those for EE. Thankfully math has always been fairly easy for me so that's a big plus in Engineering
 
  • #11
C268. I don't think we have to take Thermodynamics or Fluids, but I know we have to take Engineering Stats which I have heard lots of terrible things about. I know a couple of the guys that are almost done with the EE program, and they said that Electrodynamics is a pretty rough class.. well all of the EE classes are hard, but they said Electrodynamics and Engineering Stats in particular suck.
 
  • #12
As ecneicS pointed, it will depend if your class is proof based or not. If it's proof based, then you will have to actually spend time thinking about your proofs, making sure they actually make sense, etc.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K