Engineering Skills: Am I Qualified?

AI Thread Summary
To become an engineer, a strong foundation in math and science is essential, along with skills in analytical reasoning and structural visualization. While hands-on experience is often emphasized, theoretical understanding and practical application are equally important. Curiosity about how things work and an imaginative approach can lead to innovative solutions. Family doubts about hands-on skills should not deter someone from pursuing engineering, as modeling and conceptual thinking can compensate for a lack of tinkering experience. Ultimately, broadening one's thinking and exploring various engineering concepts can pave the way for success in the field.
stjimmy
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
I was wondering what skills I need to be an engineer.You see I am very curious and I like to know how things work.I like to be theoritical a lot but I don't like things that aren't useful

I am very good at math and also at science.I love all types of science physics and math in particular. I can grasp concepts quite quickly and am very analytical. However I am not very hands-on or into tinkering.I still like to be practical though.Personailtywise I am very introverted I like to know and go with gut feelings and I also like the abstract and the future a lot.I love the new and also like to be imaginative.I value reason and intellect.I like to keep my options open

My family doubts my ability to be an engineering student.I guess because I am not a hands on person or a tinkerer.I do like to know how things work and also i am very pratical as well.I just don't have a junkyard and take things apart all the time.

I also took a look at an article saying that the main skills are structural visualization and Math/Analytical Reasoning and I am very good at those!

So what do you think! :smile:
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
hi
you can try out things by modeling
you can make some modification so that the disadvantages in the model could be found and you can try to overcome it
thereby you can create a new concept
the only thing you have to do is to THINK WIDER......
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top