Can entangled particles communicate through time?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jim White
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wormhole
Jim White
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Thought experiment; You entangle a pair of particles. a chrono-naught takes one half of the pair and gets into Eisenstein's train, which now encircles the earth, and is then accelerated to .999 the speed of light and continues around the Earth for a million years or so. the other half of the entangled pair is placed in a time capsule and sealed for a million years or so. An observer on the moon would see a pair of entangled particles, one racing around the planet, the other sitting in a box. The chrono-naught would have slowed his passage through time, while the particle in the box would have experienced normal time passage. (relative to each other) But what happens when both particles are stopped at a predetermined point in time set by the time capsule box and then a message is passed from the chrono-naught VIA the entangled particle to the other particle in the box? Is the past talking to the future?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The short answer is that the chrono-naught cannot pass any massage via entanglement alone.

If you look at a particle by itself, there is no way of knowing if it is half of an entangled pair or not. There is no measurement (as far as Quantum mechanics can tell us) that could ever tell you this either. If there was, then you could communicate via entanglement, but because there isn't you can't.

If you're curious how we can know this, and you'd like to look it up, I think it's called the no-signalling theorem.

Interesting scenario, though.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Back
Top