Entropy: Destruction or Transformation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SarcasticSully
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Entropy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of entropy in thermodynamic reactions, particularly focusing on scenarios where a reaction appears to decrease entropy while being exothermic. It is clarified that entropy cannot be destroyed; rather, it is a measure of energy dispersal that is accounted for in closed systems. The conversation highlights that a reaction with negative entropy is unlikely to be exothermic, prompting a request for examples. A specific example is provided where water freezing in a fridge is cited as an exothermic process that decreases entropy, with the implication that the entropy is transferred to the surroundings, illustrating the principle that while local entropy may decrease, the total entropy of the system and surroundings increases. The need for precise language in discussing these concepts is emphasized to avoid confusion.
SarcasticSully
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Ok so entropy cannot be destroyed, right? So let's say you have a reaction that decreases entropy (s<0) but it also is exothermic (h<0) and that overpowers the entropy decrease so it is spontaneous (ie h-ts=g<0). If that happens, where does the entropy go?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
If that is a closed system, then you have just described a net increase in entropy.
Possibly it is the imprecise use of words that is confusing you - or you are pulling my leg.
Redo the description, and describe it more carefully.
 
"destroyed" is an odd term to use here: entropy is energy. It doesn't get destroyed, it gets counted. And I don't think it is possible for a negative entropy reaction to be exothermic. Do you have any examples?
 
If I put glass of water into the fridge it will "spontaneously" freeze. This process is both exothermic and has a decreasing entropy. But it so blatantly obvious where the entropy "goes" I am not even going to mention it.
 
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
Back
Top