EPROM Programmer: Programming TMS2532 Chips w/ 25v

  • Thread starter Thread starter imsmooth
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
Programming TMS2532 chips requires a 25V supply, which the GQ-4x4 programmer fails to provide reliably. Users suggest alternatives like the EMP-20, though it uses a parallel port, which is less desirable. A high-intensity UV light exposure at 2537 Angstroms is necessary before programming, with some users sharing improvised methods for UV exposure. The TL866-3G programmer is mentioned as a potential solution, but its effectiveness for this specific chip is uncertain. There is a need for a reliable programmer that consistently delivers the required 25V for successful programming of TMS2532 chips.
imsmooth
Messages
154
Reaction score
13
I want to program some TMS2532 chips that need 25v in order to program. The GQ-4x4 does not seem to be doing it. Any suggestions for a USB-type programmer for this task? I've seen the EMP-20, but it uses a parallel port that I am not thrilled about.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Before this device is programmed, it must be exposed to a high-intensity uv light (2537 Angstroms).
Are you doing that?
If not, from personal experience I have discovered that an arc lamp improvised from a 40VDC supply and a #2 pencil will make quick work of it.
Most device programmers (such as your GQ-4x4) are able to scan the target device and report whether it is fully erased.
 
Yes
I’ve successfully programmed chips many times and I have a UV eraser.

My success with the 2532 is intermittent and when I put in oscilloscope on the pins I can see my programmer is not hitting the 25 V needed.
 
I haven't used that kind of programmer for a while. Even if I recalled model numbers, they likely wouldn't be available anymore.
Do you do "Blank" checks before programming?
 
Yes. Again, I am just asking if anyone knows of a good programmer that hits 25v reliably because the one I have doesn't.
 
I am trying to understand how transferring electric from the powerplant to my house is more effective using high voltage. The suggested explanation that the current is equal to the power supply divided by the voltage, and hence higher voltage leads to lower current and as a result to a lower power loss on the conductives is very confusing me. I know that the current is determined by the voltage and the resistance, and not by a power capability - which defines a limit to the allowable...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
3K