Epsilon Delta Proof, need clarification

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the limit of 1/x as x approaches c, where c is not zero. Participants clarify that bounding the factor 1/|x| means finding a maximum value M for this expression within a specific interval around c that avoids zero. They explain the transition from |c-x| to |x-c| as a matter of absolute value properties. The choice of delta is justified by ensuring it is small enough to keep x away from zero, allowing for a controlled environment to satisfy the limit condition. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of selecting appropriate bounds and intervals in epsilon-delta proofs.
haribol
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Prove that

<br /> lim_{x \rightarrow c} \ \ \frac{1}{x}=\frac{1}{c} \ ,c\neq0<br />

Proof

We must find \delta such that:

1.

<br /> 0&lt;|x-c|&lt;\delta \ \Rightarrow \ | \ \frac{1}{x}=\frac{1}{c}|&lt;\epsilon<br />

Now,

2.

| \ \frac{1}{x}=\frac{1}{c}|=| \ \frac{c-x}{xc}|= \frac{1}{|x|} \cdot \frac{1}{|c|} \cdot |x-c|<br />

The factor \frac{1}{|x|} is not good if its near 0. We can bound this factor if x can be away from 0. Note:

3.

<br /> |c|=|c-x+x| \leq |c-x|+|x|<br />

so

4.

<br /> |x| \geq |c|-|x-c|<br />

Thus if we choose

5.

<br /> \delta \leq \frac{|c|}{2}<br />

6.

then we can succeed in making
<br /> |x| \geq \frac{|c|}{2}<br />

Finally, if we also require

7.

\delta \leq \frac{\epsilon c^2}{2}

then,

8.

<br /> \frac {1}{|x|} \cdot \frac{1}{|c|} \cdot |x-c| &lt; \frac {1}{|c|} \cdot \frac {1}{|c|/2} \cdot \frac{\epsilon c^2}{2} = \epsilon<br />


My questions

1. On step 2, its said to "bound" the factor 1/|x|. What does this mean?

2.How did the |c-x| on step 3 went to |x-c| on step 4?

3. How did they choose \delta to be that value?

Any help on this subject is very much appreciated, thank you in advance.

This example is from "Calculus 8th Edition" by Varberg, Purcell and Rigdon.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. Since c doesn't equal 0, there exists a (tiny) region about c which doesn't contain 0. This region is what we care about.
2. The negative of the first difference has equal magnitude as the difference itself.
 
Some more thoughts...

1. As Arnildo wrote, as c!=0, there is an interval
I:=[c-z,c+z]
that doesn't contain the origin. If you like, z can be half the distance between c and 0 to ensure
a. if c<0 that c+z<0
b. if c>0 that c-z>0.

z could also be 3/4 the distance between 0 and c or some such. A picture might be helpful.

On I, 1/|x| can be "bounded" which means that we can find a number M such that for x in I, 1/|x| <= M. You can find a formula for M depending on c and z but NOT x. This M is used in step 8 somewhere.

You have |1/x - 1/c| < (M/|c|) |x-c| < (M/|c|) delta.

Then if delta = epsilon * (|c|/M), then we'd have that for an epsilon>0 there is a delta such that if |x-c|<delta, then |1/x-1/c|<epsilon.
 
Thank you very much guys
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top