MHB Equation for Finding Solutions of x and y

  • Thread starter Thread starter Albert1
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the equation $4x + 3y - 2x\left[\frac{x^2 + y^2}{x^2}\right] = 0$ for variables x and y. Participants clarify whether y should be expressed in terms of x and discuss the notation used, specifically whether brackets denote the greatest integer function. The correct approach involves ensuring x is not zero and dividing the equation by $x^2$, leading to the expression $3\frac{y}{x} = \text{integer}$. The final conclusion is that the relationship between y and x can be expressed as $3y = kx$, where k is an integer. The discussion emphasizes the importance of methodical procedures in finding the correct solutions.
Albert1
Messages
1,221
Reaction score
0
find solutions of $x$ and $y$

$4x+3y-2x\begin{bmatrix}
\dfrac{x^2+y^2}{x^2}
\end{bmatrix}=0
$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: find solutions of equation

Albert said:
find solutions of $x$ and $y$

$4x+3y-2x\begin{bmatrix}
\dfrac{x^2+y^2}{x^2}
\end{bmatrix}=0
$

Do you mean to find y in terms of x?
 
Re: find solutions of equation

Prove It said:
Do you mean to find y in terms of x?
if x,y not specialized value , then express y in terms of x
 
Re: find solutions of equation

Expand, move everything with a y to one side, and then complete the square to solve for y.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Re: find solutions of equation

Albert said:
find solutions of $x$ and $y$

$4x+3y-2x\begin{bmatrix}
\dfrac{x^2+y^2}{x^2}
\end{bmatrix}=0
$

Is [ ] denoting the greatest integer function or is it just a bracket replacement of ( ) ?
 
Re: find solutions of equation

Evobeus said:
Is [ ] denoting the greatest integer function or is it just a bracket replacement of ( ) ?

[ ] denotes the greatest integer function
 
Albert said:
find solutions of $x$ and $y$

$4x+3y-2x\begin{bmatrix}
\dfrac{x^2+y^2}{x^2}
\end{bmatrix}=0
$

First we easily see that $x \ne 0$
So, now divide both sides of the given equation by $x$
We get,
$4+3 \frac{y}{x} -2\begin{bmatrix}
\dfrac{x^2+y^2}{x^2}
\end{bmatrix} =0$
From there we see that $\frac{y}{x}$ must be an integer.
Thus,
$y=k*x$ where $k$ is an integer.
Now replace $y$ with $k*x$ in the given equation and divide it by $x$.
This gives us
$2k^2-3k-2=0$
Solving for $k$ gives us $k=2$ or $k=-\frac{1}{2}$
Therefore,
$x$ is any non zero real number and $y=k*x$ where $k=2$ or $k=-\frac{1}{2}$
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Evobeus said:
First we easily see that $x \ne 0$
So, now divide both sides of the given equation by $x$
We get,
$4+3 \frac{y}{x} -2\begin{bmatrix}
\dfrac{x^2+y^2}{x^2}
\end{bmatrix} =0$
From there we see that $\frac{y}{x}$ must be an integer.
Thus,
$y=k*x$ where $k$ is an integer.
Now replace $y$ with $k*x$ in the given equation and divide it by $x$.
This gives us
$2k^2-3k-2=0$
Solving for $k$ gives us $k=2$ or $k=-\frac{1}{2}$
Therefore,
$x$ is any non zero real number and $y=k*x$ where $k=2$ or $k=-\frac{1}{2}$
$y=2x , \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\bigcirc \\
y=-\dfrac{x}{2}, \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\times$
$y=kx $
(where $k$ may or may not be an integer)
 
Evobeus said:
First we easily see that $x \ne 0$
So, now divide both sides of the given equation by $x$
We get,
$4+3 \frac{y}{x} -2\begin{bmatrix}
\dfrac{x^2+y^2}{x^2}
\end{bmatrix} =0$
From there we see that $\frac{y}{x}$ must be an integer.
Thus,
$y=k*x$ where $k$ is an integer.
Now replace $y$ with $k*x$ in the given equation and divide it by $x$.
This gives us
$2k^2-3k-2=0$
Solving for $k$ gives us $k=2$ or $k=-\frac{1}{2}$
Therefore,
$x$ is any non zero real number and $y=k*x$ where $k=2$ or $k=-\frac{1}{2}$

My solution (the one quoted above {^^} [ in this post ] ) is correct in terms of the idea or methodical procedure or algorithm (algorithm is a good word) but is wrong in terms of the answer

Although Albert's post very effectively helped me (and I am sure many who read my solution), but I cannot understand Albert's claim clearly (sorry for that --it is my fault )

Albert said:
$y=2x , \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\bigcirc \\
y=-\dfrac{x}{2}, \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\times$
$y=kx $
(where $k$ may or may not be an integer)
So, after spending so many words on something that could be described in a single line I describe the error and the solution again :
First : See that $x \ne 0$ [why ? ] [Reason : $x^2$ is in the denomianator ]
Second : Divide both sides of the given equation by $x^2$ [It is possible because $x \ne 0$ and $x,y \in \mathbb{R}$ ]
Third: we get an expression
$4+3*\frac{y}{x} - 2 ( \lfloor \frac{x^2+y^2}{x^2} \rfloor ) = 0$
Fourth:We get an expression
$3* \frac{y}{x}$ = integer
So ,
$3y=k*x$ where $k$ is integer.
earlier I wrote :
$y=k*x$ where $k$ is an integer but actually $\boxed{3}y=k*x$ where $k$ is an integer.

Now proceed as done in the solution and get the solution.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
Evobeus said:
My solution (the one quoted above {^^} [ in this post ] ) is correct in terms of the idea or methodical procedure or algorithm (algorithm is a good word) but is wrong in terms of the answer

Although Albert's post very effectively helped me (and I am sure many who read my solution), but I cannot understand Albert's claim clearly (sorry for that --it is my fault )

So, after spending so many words on something that could be described in a single line I describe the error and the solution again :
First : See that $x \ne 0$ [why ? ] [Reason : $x^2$ is in the denomianator ]
Second : Divide both sides of the given equation by $x^2$ [It is possible because $x \ne 0$ and $x,y \in \mathbb{R}$ ]
Third: we get an expression
$4+3*\frac{y}{x} - 2 ( \lfloor \frac{x^2+y^2}{x^2} \rfloor ) = 0$
Fourth:We get an expression
$3* \frac{y}{x}$ = integer
So ,
$3y=k*x$ where $k$ is integer.
earlier I wrote :
$y=k*x$ where $k$ is an integer but actually $\boxed{3}y=k*x$ where $k$ is an integer.

Now proceed as done in the solution and get the solution.
so the solutions
(1)y=2x correct
(2)y=-0.5x wrong
check it again
 
Back
Top