Equation of motion and acceleration

AI Thread Summary
The equation (vf + vi)/2 is often associated with constant acceleration, but it can also apply in specific cases of non-constant acceleration. An example provided is v = At^3 + B, valid for the time interval -1 s to 1 s, where A and B are constants. This illustrates that while the equation is primarily used for constant acceleration scenarios, it can yield valid results under certain conditions of varying acceleration. The discussion highlights the need for careful consideration of the acceleration type when applying this equation. Understanding these nuances is crucial for accurate motion analysis.
Ali Asadullah
Messages
99
Reaction score
0
How can we prove that (vf+vi)/2 is valid only for constant acceleration?? :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ali Asadullah said:
How can we prove that (vf+vi)/2 is valid only for constant acceleration?? :confused:
That is not true. It can be valid for non-constant acceleration, in some cases.

Example:
v = At3 + B, -1 s ≤ t ≤ 1 s, where A and B are constants​
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top