Equation of Motion: Calculating Braking Distance on a Straight Road

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the braking distance of a car traveling at 25 m/s with a constant retardation of 5 m/s² when encountering an obstacle. The calculations show that the car comes to a halt 2.5 meters in front of a tree located 65 meters ahead after applying the brakes. Additionally, if the driver had a one-second reaction time before braking, the car would have traveled 25 meters before deceleration, leaving 40 meters to stop. Using the same equations of motion, it is determined that the car would hit the tree at a speed of 15 m/s. These calculations highlight the importance of immediate reaction in emergency braking situations.
nasadall
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Thanks.

This next one is a bit confusing, not so much the first part, its the second, i think i got it wright, i just don't know how to put it on peper to present it to the tutor.

b) A car is being driven along a straight and level road at a steady speed of
25 ms-1 when the driver suddenly notices that there is a fallen tree blocking the
road 65 metres ahead. The driver immediately applies the brakes giving the car
a constant retardation of 5 ms-2.

i) How far in front of the tree does the car come to a halt?

u=25 m/s v=0 m/s a=-5 m/s2 s=?

so using v2=u2+2as

my result was

02=252+2(-5)s
0=625+(-10)s
10s=-0-625
s=-625/-10
s=62.5

then i take away the 62.5 meters treveled while deccelerating, from the 65 meters from where the tree was spoted.

65-62.5 = 2.5 meters that the car came to a halt in front of the tree.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ii) If the driver had not reacted immediately and the brakes were applied one second later, with what speed would the car have hit the tree?


u=25 m/s a=-5 m/s2 s=65 m - (1 sec reaction time = 25 m/s) = 40 m? v=?

same formula

v2=252+(-5)40
v2=625+(-10)40
v2=625+(-400)
v2=225
v=√225
v=15

The car hit the tree with a velocity of 15 m/s
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top