Equation of motion of particle in gravitational field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the equation of motion for particle m1 under the gravitational influence of particle m2. The gravitational force is expressed as F=Gm1m2/r^2, leading to the acceleration equation a=-Gm2/(x2-x1)^2. Participants express confusion about solving the resulting second-order differential equation, d^2x1/dt^2=-Gm2/(x2-x1)^2, due to the changing distance between the particles. Suggestions include considering analytical methods for solving the equation. The conversation highlights the complexity of gravitational interactions and the need for a clear approach to find the motion of m1.
Gebar
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We have two particles, m1 and m2 at positions x1 and x2, and we want to come up with the equation of motion of particle m1 due to the gravitational field of m2 (position of m1 as a function of time).


Homework Equations


F=Gm1m2/r^2
F=ma


The Attempt at a Solution


m1a=-Gm1m2/r^2
a=-Gm2/(x2-x1)^2
d^2x1/dt^2=-Gm2/(x2-x1)^2

Now, I don't know how to solve this. Any help will by appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
im confused at what ur asking for but here we go it might give u a start

F= Gm1m2/r^2
F=ma

m1a=Gm1m2/r^2

a=Gm2/r^2

v/t=Gm2/r^2

v=Gm2t/r^2

then use Speed = dist/time

is that what u wanted?
 
Aaron321 said:
im confused at what ur asking for but here we go it might give u a start

F= Gm1m2/r^2
F=ma

m1a=Gm1m2/r^2

a=Gm2/r^2

v/t=Gm2/r^2

v=Gm2t/r^2

then use Speed = dist/time

is that what u wanted?
The accelaration changes since the distance between the particles changes, so I think this has to be solved analytically. I just don't know how to handle the final equation I gave, d^2x1/dt^2=-Gm2/(x2-x1)^2
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top