Equation of motion with proportional drag

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the equations of motion for an object experiencing proportional drag, represented by the equation m⋅dv/dt = -m⋅g - k⋅v. The user initially presents a velocity equation, v(t) = (mg/k)(-1 + e^(-k/m⋅t)) + v_0⋅e^(-k/m⋅t), but expresses doubt about its accuracy due to discrepancies observed in graphing the results. After some back-and-forth, it is confirmed that the initial conditions were misinterpreted, but the user still encounters issues with the resulting graphs not aligning with expected behavior. Ultimately, they seek clarification on the integration of the velocity equation and its implications for the distance equation, leading to a proposed final form for the position equation. The conversation highlights the complexities of solving motion equations with drag and the importance of accurate initial conditions.
Hannibal123
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



the forces will be like this

m⋅dv/dt=-m⋅g-k⋅v

I need to find the velocity equation and the place equation, thereby meaning the integral of the velocity equation. for the condition t,v=0,v_0



The Attempt at a Solution


i have found this
v(t)=mg/k*(-1+e^(-k/m⋅t))+v_0⋅e^(-k/m⋅t) or in picture form http://imgur.com/WjksG

But I am not sure it's correct
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hannibal123 said:

Homework Statement



the forces will be like this

m⋅dv/dt=-m⋅g-k⋅v

I need to find the velocity equation and the place equation, thereby meaning the integral of the velocity equation. for the condition t,v=0,v_0

The Attempt at a Solution


i have found this
v(t)=\frac{mg}{k}(-1+e^{-\frac{k}{m}t})+v_0⋅e^{-\frac{k}{m}t} or in picture form http://imgur.com/WjksG

But I am not sure it's correct

It looks correct, but v0=0 .

Edit: I misread vo, so it is correct.

ehild
 
Last edited:
Your answer looks right to me. Why do you doubt it?
 
ehild said:
It looks correct, but v0=0 .

ehild

I read the OP condition as initially (t,v) = (0, v0)
 
haruspex said:
I read the OP condition as initially (t,v) = (0, v0)
Sorry, I misread it. Edit my post.

ehild
 
haruspex said:
I read the OP condition as initially (t,v) = (0, v0)

that is what i meant. I doubt the results because when i draw them in a graph they dosen't seem to be correct. I have drawn them i geogebra if you are familiar with that software.
My values are:
m: 0,145 kg
k: 0,0032
g: (gravity acceleration) 9,82
v_0: 9,93 m/s

this is what i have entered in geogebra: g(x) =(0.145*9.82/0.0032)*(-1 + ℯ^(0x / 0.15)) + 9.93ℯ^(0x / 0.15)
if you want to try for yourself (should save you some time). These values are not meant for a proportional drag, but still it seems weird that the graph looks like one of a constant function
http://imgur.com/FFElN (the red one)
 
Furthermore when i integrate the velocity equation i get this http://imgur.com/IO6G6
Again not sure if I am correct
 
Hannibal123 said:
m: 0,145 kg
k: 0,0032
g: (gravity acceleration) 9,82
v_0: 9,93 m/s

this is what i have entered in geogebra: g(x) =(0.145*9.82/0.0032)*(-1 + ℯ^(0x / 0.15)) + 9.93ℯ^(0x / 0.15)
How did -k/m end up as 0 / 0.15? Looks like rounding error, and the red line graph seems to be a consequence.
 
  • #10
this is the equation of place (if that is the correct term in english) as far as I am concerned the height is not suposed to be negative to positive time values?
http://imgur.com/CxAYC
 
  • #11
Your velocity time graph shows velocity +ve at time 0, so the distance time graph should show distance increasing at time 0.
 
  • #12
Indeed it should, however it dosen't. Is this a wrong integration of the velocity equation?
http://imgur.com/A6BKT
Based on the gaph it does not seem to be correct.
 
  • #13
Just found the correct place equation i think
http://imgur.com/quiLu
can you see a good way to shoten it?
 
  • #14
Looks right. I'd write it as
\frac{mg}{k}\left(-t+\left(\frac{m}{k}+\frac{v_0}{g}\right)\left(1-e^{-\frac{kt}{m}}\right)\right)
 
Back
Top