Equation of resistance from given graph

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the equation for resistance from a given graph, leading to the expression R(T) = R(0)^(1 - T_○^2/T^2). Participants express confusion over the choice of R(0) and T_○, suggesting that these constants should not be introduced prematurely. It is recommended to reformulate the linear equation in a more general form, ln R = -k/T^2 + m, before identifying the constants. This approach aims to align the derived equation with the options provided in the reference material. Ultimately, clarity on the definitions of R(0) and T_○ is essential for matching the results with the correct answer.
Aurelius120
Messages
269
Reaction score
24
Homework Statement
Given the graph of ##lnR## vs ##T^{-2}##, predict the relationship between resistance and temperature
Relevant Equations
NA
1000016494.jpg

From the graph:
$$lnR(T)=\frac{-lnR(0)T^2_○}{T^2}+lnR(0)$$
I have assumed ##R(0)## to be the value of ##R## at ##1/T^2=0## and ##T_○## to be the value of ##T## at ##lnR(T)=0##
From this I get,
$$R(T)=e^{lnR(0)×\left(1-\frac{T_○^2}{T^2}\right)}$$
$$R(T)=R(0)^{\left(1-\frac{T_○^2}{T^2}\right)}$$
This does not match with any of the options.
I couldn't reduce it any of the options either.

Maybe my choice of ##R(0)## and the one in the options refer to different quantities. Even so I could not get to the right answer(given option-c in the book).

Please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Aurelius120 said:
I have assumed ##R(0)## to be the value of ##R## at ##1/T^2=0## and ##T_○## to be the value of ##T## at ##lnR(T)=0##
I would assume R0 is the value of R when T=T0.
 
It is unclear to me why you have included ##\ln R_0## in the linear term. There is no reason to.

I suggest you write the linear equation on a more agnostic form ##\ln R = -k/T^2 + m##, solve for ##R##, and only then try to identify ##R_0## and ##T_0##.
 
haruspex said:
I would assume R0 is the value of R when T=T0.
I would not assume anything. I would wait with introducing the constants ##R_0## and ##T_0## until I can introduce them to get the result on one of the given forms. As should be clear from the given forms, ##R_0## is the value of ##R## in particular limits depending on the option. (##T = 0## for a and b, ##T \to \infty## for c, and ##T = 1## for d)
 
Orodruin said:
It is unclear to me why you have included ##\ln R_0## in the linear term. There is no reason to.

I suggest you write the linear equation on a more agnostic form ##\ln R = -k/T^2 + m##, solve for ##R##, and only then try to identify ##R_0## and ##T_0##.
Done
$$ln(R(T))=\frac{-k}{T^2}+m$$
$$R(T)=e^{(-k/T^2+m)}=e^m×e^{-k/T^2}=R_○e^{-T_○^2/T^2}$$
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
Back
Top