Equation of resistance from given graph

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the equation of resistance, R(T), from a given graph using the natural logarithm function. The participants analyze the equation $$lnR(T)=\frac{-lnR(0)T^2_○}{T^2}+lnR(0)$$ and suggest that the constants R(0) and T_○ should be defined more clearly to match the options provided in a textbook. The consensus is to express the equation in a more general form, $$\ln R = -k/T^2 + m$$, before identifying specific values for R(0) and T_0 based on the limits of the options.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of logarithmic functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with resistance equations in physics
  • Knowledge of the relationship between temperature and resistance
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about the derivation of resistance equations in thermodynamics
  • Study the application of natural logarithms in physical equations
  • Research the significance of constants in resistance-temperature relationships
  • Explore the implications of different boundary conditions on resistance equations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying thermodynamics and electrical engineering, as well as anyone involved in analyzing resistance behavior in materials.

Aurelius120
Messages
269
Reaction score
24
Homework Statement
Given the graph of ##lnR## vs ##T^{-2}##, predict the relationship between resistance and temperature
Relevant Equations
NA
1000016494.jpg

From the graph:
$$lnR(T)=\frac{-lnR(0)T^2_○}{T^2}+lnR(0)$$
I have assumed ##R(0)## to be the value of ##R## at ##1/T^2=0## and ##T_○## to be the value of ##T## at ##lnR(T)=0##
From this I get,
$$R(T)=e^{lnR(0)×\left(1-\frac{T_○^2}{T^2}\right)}$$
$$R(T)=R(0)^{\left(1-\frac{T_○^2}{T^2}\right)}$$
This does not match with any of the options.
I couldn't reduce it any of the options either.

Maybe my choice of ##R(0)## and the one in the options refer to different quantities. Even so I could not get to the right answer(given option-c in the book).

Please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Aurelius120 said:
I have assumed ##R(0)## to be the value of ##R## at ##1/T^2=0## and ##T_○## to be the value of ##T## at ##lnR(T)=0##
I would assume R0 is the value of R when T=T0.
 
It is unclear to me why you have included ##\ln R_0## in the linear term. There is no reason to.

I suggest you write the linear equation on a more agnostic form ##\ln R = -k/T^2 + m##, solve for ##R##, and only then try to identify ##R_0## and ##T_0##.
 
haruspex said:
I would assume R0 is the value of R when T=T0.
I would not assume anything. I would wait with introducing the constants ##R_0## and ##T_0## until I can introduce them to get the result on one of the given forms. As should be clear from the given forms, ##R_0## is the value of ##R## in particular limits depending on the option. (##T = 0## for a and b, ##T \to \infty## for c, and ##T = 1## for d)
 
Orodruin said:
It is unclear to me why you have included ##\ln R_0## in the linear term. There is no reason to.

I suggest you write the linear equation on a more agnostic form ##\ln R = -k/T^2 + m##, solve for ##R##, and only then try to identify ##R_0## and ##T_0##.
Done
$$ln(R(T))=\frac{-k}{T^2}+m$$
$$R(T)=e^{(-k/T^2+m)}=e^m×e^{-k/T^2}=R_○e^{-T_○^2/T^2}$$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
46
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
922
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K