Equation of resistance from given graph

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the equation for resistance from a given graph, leading to the expression R(T) = R(0)^(1 - T_○^2/T^2). Participants express confusion over the choice of R(0) and T_○, suggesting that these constants should not be introduced prematurely. It is recommended to reformulate the linear equation in a more general form, ln R = -k/T^2 + m, before identifying the constants. This approach aims to align the derived equation with the options provided in the reference material. Ultimately, clarity on the definitions of R(0) and T_○ is essential for matching the results with the correct answer.
Aurelius120
Messages
269
Reaction score
24
Homework Statement
Given the graph of ##lnR## vs ##T^{-2}##, predict the relationship between resistance and temperature
Relevant Equations
NA
1000016494.jpg

From the graph:
$$lnR(T)=\frac{-lnR(0)T^2_○}{T^2}+lnR(0)$$
I have assumed ##R(0)## to be the value of ##R## at ##1/T^2=0## and ##T_○## to be the value of ##T## at ##lnR(T)=0##
From this I get,
$$R(T)=e^{lnR(0)×\left(1-\frac{T_○^2}{T^2}\right)}$$
$$R(T)=R(0)^{\left(1-\frac{T_○^2}{T^2}\right)}$$
This does not match with any of the options.
I couldn't reduce it any of the options either.

Maybe my choice of ##R(0)## and the one in the options refer to different quantities. Even so I could not get to the right answer(given option-c in the book).

Please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Aurelius120 said:
I have assumed ##R(0)## to be the value of ##R## at ##1/T^2=0## and ##T_○## to be the value of ##T## at ##lnR(T)=0##
I would assume R0 is the value of R when T=T0.
 
It is unclear to me why you have included ##\ln R_0## in the linear term. There is no reason to.

I suggest you write the linear equation on a more agnostic form ##\ln R = -k/T^2 + m##, solve for ##R##, and only then try to identify ##R_0## and ##T_0##.
 
haruspex said:
I would assume R0 is the value of R when T=T0.
I would not assume anything. I would wait with introducing the constants ##R_0## and ##T_0## until I can introduce them to get the result on one of the given forms. As should be clear from the given forms, ##R_0## is the value of ##R## in particular limits depending on the option. (##T = 0## for a and b, ##T \to \infty## for c, and ##T = 1## for d)
 
Orodruin said:
It is unclear to me why you have included ##\ln R_0## in the linear term. There is no reason to.

I suggest you write the linear equation on a more agnostic form ##\ln R = -k/T^2 + m##, solve for ##R##, and only then try to identify ##R_0## and ##T_0##.
Done
$$ln(R(T))=\frac{-k}{T^2}+m$$
$$R(T)=e^{(-k/T^2+m)}=e^m×e^{-k/T^2}=R_○e^{-T_○^2/T^2}$$
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top