Equation of state for a real gas

WWCY
Messages
476
Reaction score
14
Homework Statement
The equation of state for some gas is ##P(V-b) = RT)## (V is the volume occupied by a mole of gas), show that the internal energy of this gas is a function of temperature only.

My work leads to the wrong answer, some assistance in pointing out my mistake is greatly appreciated!
Relevant Equations
Real gas equations
My work was as follows:

The first law states ##dU = TdS - PdV##, and thus
$$p =- (\partial U/\partial V)| _S$$
$$U = -RT \ln(V-b) + f(S)$$
To determine ##f(S)##, I reasoned that in the ideal gas limit of ##b = 0##, ##U## should take the form of the ideal gas' molar internal energy ##\frac{3}{2} RT##. So I set ##b = 0## and compare the expressions for energy in the ideal gas limit to obtain
$$f(S) = \frac{3}{2}RT + RT \ln (V)$$
However, inserting this into the internal energy expression for the real gas gives
$$U = \frac{3}{2}RT + RT \ln \big(\frac{V}{V-b} \big)$$
which doesn't seem to be independent of V.

What have I done incorrectly?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe, it’s better to use the Thermodynamic Equation of State:

##\left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial V}\right) _{T} = T\left(\frac{\partial p}{\partial T}\right) _{V}-p##
 
Hi, thank you for your response.

Lord Jestocost said:
Maybe, it’s better to use the Thermodynamic Equation of State:

##\left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial V}\right) _{T} = T\left(\frac{\partial p}{\partial T}\right) _{V}-p##

I don't quite get what you mean by this, and I still don't get why my method was wrong. Do you mind elaborating? Thank you.Edit: And also, why does the "correct" method involve performing an integral using ##p = -\Big(\frac{\partial F}{\partial V} \Big)_T## to obtain ##F##, rather than using the first law to obtain ##U## directly?
 
Last edited:
Your initial integration is incorrect because, at constant S, T is a function of V.
 
  • Like
Likes Lord Jestocost
Thanks for your reply,

Chestermiller said:
Your initial integration is incorrect because, at constant S, T is a function of V.

In this case, how do I discern that constant entropy processes mean that T is a function of V?

Also, is there a way to find out in general whether one thermodynamic variable varies with another variable when some thermodynamic variable is kept constant?

And finally, is the reason why ##p = -\Big(\frac{\partial F}{\partial V} \Big)_T## was correct due to the fact that we have already defined ##T## to be independent of changes with ##V##?

Thank you for your patience.
 
WWCY said:
Thanks for your reply,
In this case, how do I discern that constant entropy processes mean that T is a function of V?

Thank you for your patience.
$$dS=\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial T}\right)_VdT+\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial V}\right)_TdV\tag{1}$$so, at constant entropy (dS=0), $$\left(\frac{\partial T}{\partial V}\right)_S=-\frac{\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial V}\right)_T}{\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial T}\right)_V}$$
Also, is there a way to find out in general whether one thermodynamic variable varies with another variable when some thermodynamic variable is kept constant?

And finally, is the reason why ##p = -\Big(\frac{\partial F}{\partial V} \Big)_T## was correct due to the fact that we have already defined ##T## to be independent of changes with ##V##?
The best way to solve this problem is to substitute Eqn. 1 into your original equation for dU. This leads to the relationship that Lord Jestocost posted.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes WWCY and Lord Jestocost
Chestermiller said:
$$dS=\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial T}\right)_VdT+\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial V}\right)_TdV\tag{1}$$so, at constant entropy (dS=0), $$\left(\frac{\partial T}{\partial V}\right)_S=-\frac{\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial V}\right)_T}{\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial T}\right)_V}$$

The best way to solve this problem is to substitute Eqn. 1 into your original equation for dU. This leads to the relationship that Lord Jestocost posted.
Ah I see it now, thank you both!

Just a quick question on the method I initially posted about... If for some reason I need to work with those types of integrals, does that mean I have to be extra careful about whether or not the state variables in my integrands are functions of other state variables? (e.g: ##T## was a function of ##V## with ##S## kept constant here).Also, is this reasoning correct?

WWCY said:
And finally, is the reason why ##p = -\Big(\frac{\partial F}{\partial V} \Big)_T## was correct due to the fact that we have already defined ##T## to be independent of changes with ##V##?
 
WWCY said:
Just a quick question on the method I initially posted about... If for some reason I need to work with those types of integrals, does that mean I have to be extra careful about whether or not the state variables in my integrands are functions of other state variables? (e.g: ##T## was a function of ##V## with ##S## kept constant here).
Sure.
Also, is this reasoning correct?
To see how pressure is equal to minus partial F wrt V at constant T, see my response in your other thread:
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/thermodynamics-partial-derivatives.969924/#post-6160852
 
Back
Top