A Equation of State w=1: Why Not Considered in Cosmology?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the equation of state w=1, associated with a free scalar field described by a specific Lagrangian density, which results in an energy momentum tensor where pressure equals density. Despite being a natural Lagrangian, the stiff fluid characterized by w=1 is not widely considered in cosmology, raising questions about its implications and potential observational puzzles it could address. The rapid dilution of such a fluid, with density scaling as a^-6, suggests it could influence cosmological models, though its effects on fundamental issues like matter-antimatter imbalance remain unclear. Participants express interest in understanding the contexts in which w=1 has been studied and its impact on primordial element abundances. The conversation highlights a gap in the exploration of this equation of state within cosmological frameworks.
Demystifier
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
14,598
Reaction score
7,191
A free scalar field with Lagrangian density
$${\cal L}=\frac{1}{2}g^{\mu\nu}\partial_{\mu}\phi\partial_{\nu}\phi$$
has the energy momentum tensor with the equation of state ##p=\rho##, i.e. ##w=1##. The Lagrangian density above is a very natural Lagrangian, yet the equation of state ##w=1## seems not to be considered in cosmology. Why is it not considered?
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
I believe ##w=1## is referred to as a "stiff fluid" in the literature. It's been considered, but I don't know how extensively or in what contexts.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
Demystifier said:
A free scalar field with Lagrangian density
$${\cal L}=\frac{1}{2}g^{\mu\nu}\partial_{\mu}\phi\partial_{\nu}\phi$$
has the energy momentum tensor with the equation of state ##p=\rho##, i.e. ##w=1##. The Lagrangian density above is a very natural Lagrangian, yet the the equation of state ##w=1## seems not to be considered in cosmology. Why is it not considered?
What observational puzzles would this solve? Such a fluid would dilute extremely rapidly, with density scaling as ##a^{-6}##.
 
kimbyd said:
What observational puzzles would this solve?
Certainly not the matter/antimatter imbalance... I think that is the most important puzzle of way back when. His following link discusses elemental distribution, though.
Demystifier said:
"We calculate numerically the effect of such a stiff fluid on the primordial element abundances..."
Let me know if you find anything on the matter abundances, please!
 
Abstract The Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) has significantly advanced our ability to study black holes, achieving unprecedented spatial resolution and revealing horizon-scale structures. Notably, these observations feature a distinctive dark shadow—primarily arising from faint jet emissions—surrounded by a bright photon ring. Anticipated upgrades of the EHT promise substantial improvements in dynamic range, enabling deeper exploration of low-background regions, particularly the inner shadow...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Back
Top