Equations for Parabolic Refelctors

  • Thread starter Thread starter megamax42
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around optimizing a concentrating solar power (CSP) farm using numerical methods for a final project in Environmental Resources Engineering. The participant initially proposed using equations for light intensity and the focal length of parabolic reflectors to determine optimal dimensions for the dishes. However, they recognized that their initial approach could yield impractical dimensions for the reflectors. Consequently, they decided to shift focus to polynomial interpolation of reflector prices based on diameter, aiming to minimize costs while achieving reasonable dimensions for dish diameter and depth. This adjustment reflects a more practical approach to the engineering problem at hand.
megamax42
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone, new to this forum, hoping you can give me a hand with finding formulas.

Background
I'm at Humboldt State University Studying Environmental Resources Engineering, currently taking the course Computational Methods 3. For our final project we need to solve an engineering problem using one or more numerical methods learned in class.

Topic Selection
For my final project I have chosen to optimize a CSP (concentrating solar power) farm. As seen below:

CSP+Power+Tower.jpg


Approach
My approach to optimizing the farm is comparing the height of the 'collector' to the diameter of the dish and depth, as well as how many dishes are used.

An equation I was hoping to use was the beam intensity for light:

I = P/4\pir2

Variables explained:
I = light intensity
P = power
r = radius (or more accurately: distance)

I was also hoping to use the equation for the focal length of a parabolic reflector:

f = (D2)/16C

Variables explained:
D = dish diameter
f = focal distance
C = dish depthAnd my idea was to use f (focal distance) from the focal length equation as the r (radius, or distance) in the light intensity equation. Then optimize D (dish diameter) and C (dish depth) to obtain a maximum I (light intensity).

Problem

I'm not sure if I'm on the right track with this approach. I can't help but feel like I'm missing a very important factor in this system of equations, I'm just not sure what it is.

Any help would be greatly appreciated. I am not looking for someone to give me the answers, just a push in the right direction.

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
I found the error with my approach. The equations will lead to odd dimensions for the reflector, so I've decided to perform a polynomial interpolation on available prices for reflectors based off of the diameter, which is a variable found in the focal length equation. I can then minimize costs at the same time, hopefully leading to more reasonable values of D (dish diameter) and C (dish depth).
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top