Equations for relative velocity

UglyNakedGuy
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
hello everyone,

Can someone kindly show me the equation for relative velocity calculations?

when i search for them via wikipedia, there is only one formula for collinear objects and they move to the same direction...

so what if they move opposite to each?

and what if their motions follow a curvature ...:confused:

please help :P
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The equation you mention for "relative velocity" is: if object A is moving away from me at velocity u and object B is moving along the same line and in the same direction at speed v (both relative to me) then the speed of object A relative to B is given by
\frac{u- v}{1+ \frac{uv}{c^2}}

If they are moving in opposite directions, replace "-v" with "+v".

If they are not moving along the same line, draw a line between them and calculate their components of velocity parallel and perpendicular to that line. Apply the formula above to the parallel components only.
 
HallsofIvy said:
If they are moving in opposite directions, replace "-v" with "+v".

And replace "+v" with "-v". More concisely, reverse the sign of v everywhere in the equation.
 
HallsofIvy said:
The equation you mention for "relative velocity" is: if object A is moving away from me at velocity u and object B is moving along the same line and in the same direction at speed v (both relative to me) then the speed of object A relative to B is given by
\frac{u- v}{1+ \frac{uv}{c^2}}

If they are moving in opposite directions, replace "-v" with "+v".

If they are not moving along the same line, draw a line between them and calculate their components of velocity parallel and perpendicular to that line. Apply the formula above to the parallel components only.

thank you for your reply!

unfortunately, when I search on website, I was told the equation as:

\frac{u- v}{1- \frac{uv}{c^2}}

and it says if they go opposite directions, I need to replace the sign...if you think I am paranoid :) , please check here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relative_velocity

to be honestly, I am not a guy with physics background, i just like it... so this is confusing for me... could you please help?

once again, thank you!
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
Back
Top