[Equilibrium and Pendulums] Do I have to consider the Perpendicular force?

AI Thread Summary
A pendulum bob with a mass of 2.5 kg is analyzed under the influence of gravity and tension from both a pendulum rope and a horizontal rope. The tension in the horizontal rope is 3.50 N, leading to an initial calculation of the angle θ as 8.1°. The discussion revolves around the necessity of considering the perpendicular force due to gravity and the correct terminology for the forces acting on the pendulum. Clarifications are made regarding the terms "neutral" and "pulling," with consensus that the forces include gravity and tension, and that the normal force is not applicable in this context. Ultimately, the focus is on accurately identifying and balancing the forces to determine the correct angle of the pendulum.
AJKing
Messages
104
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



A pendulum bob of mass 2.5kg is pulled aside by a horizontal rope. If the tension in the rope is 3.50N, what is the angle between the pendulum and the vertical?

mp = 2.5 kg

Tr = 3.50 N

Fg = 2.5kg * 9.8m/s2

Homework Equations



∑F = 0

Pocket full of trig functions and laws.

The Attempt at a Solution



I've been over thinking this one like a moe'sucka.

Imagining the pendulum, one may speculate that there are 3 forces acting on the bob: the force of Gravity, Tension on the pendulum rope, and the force of Tension on the horizontal rope.

It's a pretty basic under those terms, and solving it reveals:

θ = 8.1°However, I don't feel like I've solved this correctly. [Edited explanation here, was going to rewrite it but then came to a conclusion.]

My biggest question is: Do I have to concern myself with the applied force of gravity (perpendicular to the neutral force) in this instance?

If so, the question becomes much more stressing to solve. In this case, the tension in the horizontal rope becomes the horizontal factor of the perpendicular force.

I've expended most of my "goto" methods for solving these kinds of questions and even got a little crazy with trig stuff but I can't find that angle if I assume that 3.5N is only the x factor of the perpendicular force being balanced.

Any suggestions would be appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
AJKing said:
Imagining the pendulum, one may speculate that there are 3 forces acting on the bob: Gravity, Neutral, and Pulling force.
I understand gravity, but what are 'Neutral' and 'Pulling'?

It's a pretty basic under those terms, and solving it reveals:

θ = 8.1°
OK.


However, I don't feel like this accounts for the perpendicular force on the pendulum.

My biggest question is: Do I have to concern myself with the applied force of gravity (perpendicular to the neutral force) in this instance?
I don't know what you mean by 'neutral force' or 'applied force of gravity'. There are three forces acting on the pendulum bob. What are they?

Maybe you can define what you mean by your terms and restate your question.
 
Doc Al said:
I understand gravity, but what are 'Neutral' and 'Pulling'?

Yeah, I could've used better terms. I'll edit.

Pulling: Force of tension on the horizontal rope.

Neutral: The force commonly written as Fn. What's the proper name for this?
 
AJKing said:
Pulling: Force of tension on the horizontal rope.
OK, that's the tension in the horizontal rope.

Neutral: The force commonly written as Fn. What's the proper name for this?
Do you mean Normal force? That only applies between surfaces. Not applicable here.

Perhaps you are thinking of the tension in the cord of the pendulum? That's the third force acting on the pendulum bob.
 
Doc Al said:
Do you mean Normal force? That only applies between surfaces. Not applicable here.

This force is equivalent to the Tension on the pendulum rope though, correct? Fn has been used frequently to represent it in my instructional material.

And you're right, there are just 3 forces. For some reason I was imagining that I had to counter a force that's used when working with moving pendulums. Imagining the system as a mass hanging from 2 points corrected it for me (same thing, different wording).

I partially blame the hour.
 
AJKing said:
This force is equivalent to the Tension on the pendulum rope though, correct? Fn has been used frequently to represent it in my instructional material.
I've never heard the tension in a pendulum rope referred to as a 'neutral' or 'normal' force. I'd just call it tension. (But it doesn't matter what symbol you use for it, as long as you know it's a tension force.)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top