Equilibrium expressions and partial pressures

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about the equilibrium expressions for the reaction 3NO (g) + H2O (l) → 2HNO3 (aq) + NO (g), two students present different forms of the equilibrium constant, K. Student A uses concentrations, while Student B incorporates partial pressures. Both expressions can be valid depending on the context, as the value of K can vary based on how the reaction is represented. Consistency in the chosen method is crucial for accurate calculations. Ultimately, understanding the relationship between different forms of K is essential for interpreting equilibrium in chemical reactions.
brake4country
Messages
216
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


In considering the reaction:
3NO (g) + H2O (l) → 2HNO3 (aq) + NO (g)
student A writes the equilibrium expression as:
K=[NO][HNO3]2/[NO2]3
while student B writes:
K=PNO [HNO3]2/[NO2]3

Whose equation is correct?

Homework Equations


NA

The Attempt at a Solution


This is a multiple choice problem but I wanted to know how each student would arrive at a different value for K.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suppose you mean

3NO2(g) + H2O ↔ 2HNO3 + NO(g)

Lousy question IMHO, as both equations can be used this way or another. I prefer the first, as it is consistent, the latter would be OK with me if written as

K = \frac{P_{NO}[HNO_3]}{P_{NO_2}^3}

Don't worry about the fact K values are different. That's normal, K value depends on the way reaction equation is written. As long as you are consistent you will get the same final result (and if you know the reaction equations converting between different values of K is not that difficult).
 
Thank you!
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top