Equilibrium of a Rigid Body: Balancing Forces and Moments

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on analyzing the equilibrium of two masses (M and m) connected by a massless rod on a frictionless slope. Participants emphasize the importance of drawing separate free-body diagrams for each mass to accurately depict all forces acting on them, including gravitational and tension forces. There is a consensus that the rod exerts forces on both masses, and resolving these forces parallel to the slope is crucial for finding equilibrium. The conversation also touches on using potential energy equations to derive the angle of equilibrium. Overall, the key takeaway is the need for clear diagrams and equations to solve for the equilibrium angle effectively.
bbal
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
We have two masses (M and m) , which are conncected with a massless rod with a length L and placed on a frictionless slope. Find the equilibrium with respect to Φ(horizontal angle).
Relevant Equations
τ=rxF
Components of gravitational force on M: normal force:M*g*cos(90-α)M*g*sin(α)
Downhill force: M*g*sin(90-α)=M*g*cos(α)

On m: normal force: m*g*cos(α)
Downhill force: m*g*sin(α)
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20210121_100457.jpg
    IMG_20210121_100457.jpg
    27.3 KB · Views: 186
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the third force, i.e. tension between M and m through rod should be also considered.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Steve4Physics
bbal said:
Homework Statement:: We have two masses (M and m) , which are conncected with a massless rod with a length L and placed on a frictionless slope. Find the equilibrium with respect to Φ(horizontal angle).
Relevant Equations:: τ=rxF

Components of gravitational force on M: normal force:M*g*cos(90-L)=M*g*sin(L)
Downhill force: M*g*sin(90-L)=M*g*cos(L)

On m: normal force: m*g*cos(L)
Downhill force: m*g*sin(L)
Can you write terms such as cos(L) and sin(L) when 'L' (on your diagram) is a length?

To emphasise what @anuttarasammyak said, does the rod exert a force on each mass?

Have you drawn the free-body diagrams for each mass ?
 
Steve4Physics said:
Can you write terms such as cos(L) and sin(L) when 'L' (on your diagram) is a length?

To emphasise what @anuttarasammyak said, does the rod exert a force on each mass?

Have you drawn the free-body diagrams for each mass ?
Thank you for pointing out the mistake. Yes, the rod does exert force on the masses. I drew one, but I only included the components the gravitational force.
 
find critical points of the potential energy ##V=V(\phi),\quad V'(\phi)=0##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes bbal
bbal said:
I drew one, but I only included the components the gravitational force.
I'd draw *two* free body diagrams (not "one") - one for each mass. Each diagram should show all (3) forces (not components) acting on the mass, or it's not a free body diagram. It will help you if you include the angles between each each force and the plane.

Once you have your two diagrams, resolve parallel to the plane for each mass. This gives you two equations. If you post your diagrams and/or equations we can check them for you.

From the two equations it's not difficult to get Φ.

You can also do it as suggested by @wrobel using potential energy. But post some working for us to see or we can't help.
 
  • Like
Likes bbal
I came up with this I hope you can read it. As far as the one with potential is concerned, I'm still thinking about how to start that one.
 

Attachments

  • 16112546485504782101814348372358.jpg
    16112546485504782101814348372358.jpg
    30.4 KB · Views: 122
Last edited:
bbal said:
I hope you can read it
A forlorn hope, I fear.
Try again, using a darker pen.
Just draw one mass and label the forces on it. Use labels that index that mass, like ##F_{g1}## for gravitational force on mass 1. That way you can later write equations indexing the other mass and we will all know what you mean without needing another diagram.
Don't write expressions for the forces (m1g cos etc.) on the diagram. Type the equations for those into the post, like ##F_{g1}=...##.

See if you can go beyond that, writing equations that relate the forces.
 
bbal said:
I came up with this I hope you can read it. As far as the one with potential is concerned, I'm still thinking about how to start that one.
Based on the relevant equation shown in the OP, the forces that you should be concerned with are those perpendicular to the massless rod.

If the rod is in horizontal position, a clockwise moment will exist, due to the perpendicular force Mg being greater than force mg.

Therefore, the rod will naturally adopt a unique angle at which both perpendicular forces become equal and a balance of moments is achieved.
 
  • Like
Likes bbal
Back
Top