Chemistry Equilibrium of a Sparingly Soluble Ionic Compound

  • Thread starter Thread starter daphnelee-mh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equilibrium Ionic
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the highest concentration of OH- in a sparingly soluble ionic compound without causing precipitation, with a focus on achieving an accurate result. The initial answer provided is 6.61g, but discrepancies arise due to rounding errors in the concentration of OH-. Maintaining precision in intermediate calculations is emphasized, specifically not rounding [OH-] too early. Participants suggest keeping extra digits throughout the calculation and only rounding at the final step to ensure accuracy. The conversation highlights the importance of precision in chemical calculations to avoid errors in results.
daphnelee-mh
Messages
62
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
I can't get the correct answer, isn't it if Ksp>[Mn2+][OH-]^2, there is no precipitation. How to get the specific concentration of [OH-]?
Relevant Equations
Kb = [NH4+][OH-]/[NH3]
Ksp=[Mn2+][OH-]^2
1572962999036.png

Answer given is 6.61g.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are looking for the highest concentration of OH- that doesn't produce precipitation, don't you?
 
chemistry.jpeg


May I know which step is wrong? thanks
 
You have worked out the concentration in g/L. What is the mass in the actual solution?
 
chemistry.jpeg


Is this correct ? thanks.
 
It is not quite equal to the given answer; I think that's because you rounded off [OH-] to 1.4e-6 M instead of 1.435e-6 M. Keep the extra digits through the calculation, and round off to the appropriate sig figs at the end.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top