Equilibrium of a Uniform Rod with Attached Particle Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter icvotria
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moments Paper
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving a uniform rod in equilibrium with an attached particle. The rod, weighing 120N, is supported at two points, and the reactions at these points change when a particle of weight W is added. The user has calculated initial reactions at the supports but struggles to integrate these with the effects of the added weight. A suggestion is made to clarify the equations used and to ensure all necessary components are included for proper analysis. The user acknowledges a typo in their equations and plans to revisit the problem later.
icvotria
Messages
51
Reaction score
1
I'm stuck! This is the question:
A uniform rod AB has length 3m and weight 120N. The rod rests in equilibrium in a horizontal position, smoothly supported at points C and D, where AC=0.5m and AD=2m. A particle of weight W Newtons is attached tto the rod at a point E where AE=x metres. The rod remains in equilibrium and the magnitude of the reaction at C is now twice the magnitude of the reaction at D. Show that W=60/(1-x).

I've worked out the reactions at C and D before W is applied, (40N and 80N I think) and by substituting 2Rc=Rd into 180+Wx=0.5Rc+2Rd (where Rc and Rd are the reactions at C and D) I got 180+Wx=4.5Rc, but now I'm stuck. I can't figure out how to bring the 'pre-W' results and the 'post-W' results together, and I'm not even really sure if that's what I'm supposed to be doing! Could someone point me in the right direction please?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
icvotria said:
I'm stuck! This is the question:
A uniform rod AB has length 3m and weight 120N. The rod rests in equilibrium in a horizontal position, smoothly supported at points C and D, where AC=0.5m and AD=2m. A particle of weight W Newtons is attached tto the rod at a point E where AE=x metres. The rod remains in equilibrium and the magnitude of the reaction at C is now twice the magnitude of the reaction at D. Show that W=60/(1-x).

I've worked out the reactions at C and D before W is applied, (40N and 80N I think) and by substituting 2Rc=Rd into 180+Wx=0.5Rc+Rd (where Rc and Rd are the reactions at C and D) I got 180+Wx=4.5Rc, but now I'm stuck. I can't figure out how to bring the 'pre-W' results and the 'post-W' results together, and I'm not even really sure if that's what I'm supposed to be doing! Could someone point me in the right direction please?

I think you are missing a 2 in this equation

180+Wx=0.5Rc+Rd

and it looks like you used the 2 to get the equation that followed

To bring your results together you need one more piece of information. What is the final Rc + Rd in terms of the weight of the rod and the added weight, W?
 
Last edited:
OlderDan said:
I think you are missing a 2 in this equation

180+Wx=0.5Rc+Rd
That missing 2 was a typo, sorry. I've corrected it in the original question. I can't try to do the question now cos I'm piiiiiissed but I'll try again in the morning. Or maybe the afternoon. Thanks for the advice though.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top