Equilibrium of Forces on a Balanced Beam | Gymnast Force Problem Homework

  • Thread starter Thread starter wbetting
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the forces on a balance beam due to two supports, given a gymnast's weight and the beam's mass. The problem involves determining torques about support 2, with the equation set up to find the forces at both supports. A key point of confusion is the origin of the distance 3.92 m, which is clarified as the distance between the two supports, calculated by subtracting the distances from the ends of the beam. The calculations require understanding the positions of the supports and the gymnast's mass to maintain equilibrium. Overall, the focus is on correctly applying torque principles to solve for the forces acting on the beam.
wbetting
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A gymnast with mass 46.0 kg stands on the end of a uniform balance beam. The beam is 5.00 m long and has a mass of 250 kg (excluding the mass of the two supports). Each support is 0.540 m from its end of the beam. In unit-vector notation, what are the forces on the beam due to (a) support 1 and (b) support 2?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



this is my teachers solution and i have a question about it..:

For computing torques, we choose the axis to be at support 2 and consider torques that encourage counterclockwise rotation to be positive. Let m = mass of gymnast and M = mass of beam. Thus, equilibrium of torques leads to
M g (1 . 9 6 m ) − m g ( 0 . 5 4 m ) − F ( 3 . 9 2 m ) = 0 .

my question is where did 3.92 come from? i know .54 is given and 1.96 is 2.5-.54 but where does 3.92 come from? its driving me crazy!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
3.92 is the distance between the second support and the first support, solved by taking 5m and subtracting 0.54 twice.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top