Understanding Equilibrium Stability in Classical Mechanics: Virtual Work Lecture

AI Thread Summary
In classical mechanics, the stability of equilibrium can be assessed using the second derivative of potential energy, U. If the second derivative, ∂²U/∂x², is positive, the potential is at a minimum, indicating stable equilibrium. Conversely, if it is negative, the potential is at a maximum, signifying unstable equilibrium. Objects in a potential field tend to move towards lower potential, aligning with the direction of force. Understanding this relationship is crucial for analyzing equilibrium stability in mechanical systems.
gulsen
Messages
215
Reaction score
0
In classical mechanics - virtual work lecture, for determining equilibrium stability we were told that second derivate of potential can be used. How?

I've made a quick google search, but couldn't find anything remarkable.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If \frac{\partial^2U}{\partial x^2} is postive then U is at a minimum (basic calculus - second derivative test). If instead it is negative then U is at a maximum. A point of equilibrium is stable if U is minimum and unstable if U is maximum.
 
Euclid said:
A point of equilibrium is stable if U is minimum and unstable if U is maximum.

I guess this because objects in a potential field tend move through where their potentials get lower?
 
Absolutely! After all, which way does the force point?
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top