Equipartition theorem and chlorine

  • Thread starter Thread starter PeterPoPS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the average centripetal force of a chlorine molecule at 290 K using the equipartition theorem. The correct approach involves recognizing that for diatomic molecules, the average energy is E_avg = (5/2)k_BT, not (7/2)k_BT as initially assumed. The participant attempted to derive the centripetal force using the kinetic energy equation but neglected to incorporate the mass of the chlorine atom correctly. The correct centripetal force calculation yields a result of 1.6*10^-10 N, aligning with the expected answer. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately applying the equipartition theorem to diatomic molecules.
PeterPoPS
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Equipartition theorem

Homework Statement


If the chlorine molecule at 290 K were to rotate at the angular frequency predicted by the equipartition theorem what would be the average centripetal force?
(The atmos of Cl are 2*10^-10 m apart and the mass of the chlorine atom 35.45 a.m.u)

(Correct answer is 1.6*10^-10 N)

Homework Equations


Kinetic energy
E_{kin} = \frac{mv^2}{2}

Centripetal force
F_c = \frac{mv^2}{r}

Boltzmann's constant
k_B = 1.3807*10^{-23} JK^{-1}

The Attempt at a Solution


Hi!

I tried to solve it this way.
I think of my Chlorine molecule as two points. One stationary and the other one circulating around it.
From the equipartition theorem i get that the average energy of the molecule is

E = \frac{7k_BT}{2}

I think that this is equal to the kinetic energy

E = \frac{7k_BT}{2} = \frac{mv^2}{2}

so

mv^2 = 7k_BT

Using this in the equation for the centriopetal force I get

F_c = \frac{7k_BT}{r} = 1.4014^{-10}N

which is not the right answer and I havn't used the mass at all in the problem.
What's wrong??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For diatomic molecules, Eavg = 5/2 KbT.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top