Equipment Accuracy: Explaining Micro-Amp & CRO Results

AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the discrepancies between theoretical and actual measurements when using an ammeter for micro-amp readings and a cathode ray oscilloscope (CRO) for voltage peak-to-peak values. Variations in ammeter readings can stem from internal impedance and circuit loading, which affect accuracy. For CRO measurements, inherent instrument errors and the choice of probes significantly impact results, with passive probes often requiring a 10x setting for improved accuracy. It's essential to consult the scope manual for accuracy specifications and ensure the correct probe type is used for the application. Understanding these factors is crucial for achieving reliable measurements in electronic testing.
dagg3r
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
hi all, can someone explain to me if i were to theoretically calculate current using an ammeter in small units eg micro amp's 10^-6 and physically use an ammeter to obtain results why do they differ greatly?

and also when i am using a cathode ray oscilloscope (CRO), when i am measuring voltage peak-peak values what equipment\limitations\techniques are causing the results to differ greatly then the theoretical results.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You may be encountering a small internal impedance, inherent in your power supply and also the ammeter, that can cause your readings to vary from theoretical values. If your are finding large variations in your measured values from theoretical.. You may be loading your circuit. You can read more about accuracy and meter loading at this http://www.elexp.com/t_elec.htm (see parts 1 and 2).
dagg3r said:
hi all, can someone explain to me if i were to theoretically calculate current using an ammeter in small units eg micro amp's 10^-6 and physically use an ammeter to obtain results why do they differ greatly?
For the scope, there is a certain amount of error inherent in the instrument at each setting. Look at the scope manual and find its accuracy measured in percent, at various settings.. Using probes (designed to work with your scope) will also effect accuracy.
There are different http://www.optics.arizona.edu/Palmer/OPTI380B/lablec05.pdf (and settings) for different conditions. Passive probes are the most common and a 10x setting tends to improve accuracy but also attenuates the voltage of signal you're measuring. Besides passive, there are also active and current probes. Each used for different applications. Using the wrong probe, will certainly impact accuracy of your measurement.
Also when i am using a cathode ray oscilloscope (CRO), when i am measuring voltage peak-peak values what equipment\limitations\techniques are causing the results to differ greatly then the theoretical results.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top