Equipotential Lines: Finding Voltage & Potential Errors

AI Thread Summary
When finding equipotential lines using a conducting sheet, potential errors include non-zero conductivity of the sheet, human error in probe positioning, and uncertainty in multimeter readings. Deviations in electrode shape from the ideal can also introduce inaccuracies. The discussion raises a critical point about the necessity of using a non-conducting sheet to avoid measuring 0 V everywhere. Areas of no-flow or disappearing lines may occur due to these errors. Accurate experimentation requires careful consideration of these factors to ensure reliable results.
bes001
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
if i am finding the equipotential lines by using a conducting sheet, power supply, and muiltimeter to find the voltage, what types of errors can be present while experimenting? could there be areas of no-flow or disappearing lines?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Non-zero conductivity of the sheet, human error in positioning the probe, the uncertainty in the multimeter reading, deviations in the electrode shape w.r.t. the ideal shape are some of the more obvious sources of error (or uncertainty).

Also, shouldn't the sheet by non-conducting? Otherwise you would measure 0 V everywhere.

Claude.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top