Equipotential Surfaces: Calculating Work Required to Move a Charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the work required to move a charge from point E to F across equipotential surfaces. The user correctly identifies the potential difference as -80V and calculates the work done as 2.72 x 10^-4 J. Clarification is provided that the work is done by the user, not the electric field, which would be positive. It is emphasized that the work done by the user is negative because it opposes the electric field's force. The importance of understanding the direction of forces and potential in determining work is highlighted.
daimoku
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Equipotential surfaces

Homework Statement


http://personalpages.tds.net/~locowise/test/equipot1.jpg
Fig. 1 -- Some equipotential surfaces

In the figure above, you see a set of equipotentials representing an electric field in the region and some labeled points (A..G).

What is the work required by you to move a 3.4 x 10^-6 C charge from E to F?

We know k=8.99*10^9 N*m^2/C^2

Homework Equations


r = kq/v
Work = force * displacement
V2-V1=-Welec/q


The Attempt at a Solution



Calculated Re to be 196.81m and Rf to be 305.66m. <---not sure if this is necessary
Vf-Ve=-80V

-80V=-Welec/(3.4*10^-6C)
Welec comes out to be 2.72*10-4 J

Could someone point out where I made a mistake or even if I used the correct method? Many thanks for your help!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
daimoku said:
Calculated Re to be 196.81m and Rf to be 305.66m. <---not sure if this is necessary
What is this? Looks like you are trying to find the radii of the two equipotential surfaces. Do they look spherical?
Vf-Ve=-80V

-80V=-Welec/(3.4*10^-6C)
Welec comes out to be 2.72*10-4 J

Could someone point out where I made a mistake or even if I used the correct method? Many thanks for your help!

The answer looks correct, except that it should have negative sign, since the work is being done by the charge.
 
Thanks alot! You were correct-o-mundo on the negative sign!
 


The question is the work done BY ME, and NOT by the electric field. The work done by the electric field is positive as the force and displacement are in the same direction (since the charge moves from a point of higher to lower potential). Since the work is done by moving the charge without acceleration, the force given by me on the charge has to be equal and opposite to the force of the electric field on the charge. Hence the work done by me is negative.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top