Equivalence of differential operator terms in action

Mithra
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, I'm sure I'm being very stupid here but I'm reading through notes which contain various actions for fields, most of which are very similar, however there is some discrepancies with the way differential operators are shown acting on the fields and I can't for the life of me work out which are equal to which so any advice would be great.

The three forms I can see are, for a real field \phi

<br /> 1) (∂^\mu \phi)(∂_\mu \phi)<br />

<br /> 2) ∂^\mu ∂_\mu |\phi|^2<br />

<br /> 3) \phi (∂^\mu ∂_\mu) \phi<br />

These seem to often be used in very similar places but I can't really see how they relate? This is likely painfully simple and I'm just overthinking it but even just pointing in the right direction would be great, thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps it is clearer if we just write \partial_\mu \phi as the gradient \nabla\phi. In that case, the three expressions you have written are:
1) (\nabla\phi) \cdot (\nabla\phi)
2) \nabla^2 |\phi|^2
3) (\nabla^2\phi) \phi
where
\nabla \equiv \left(\frac{\partial}{\partial x}, \frac{\partial}{\partial y}, \frac{\partial}{\partial z} \right)
and
\nabla^2 \equiv \nabla \cdot \nabla = \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2} + \frac{\partial^2}{\partial y^2} + \frac{\partial^2}{\partial z^2}

It may also help you if you write out these expressions for a simple example, like \phi(x, y, z) = xyz.
 
I could be wrong, but I think (2) as you've written it doesn't describe a charged scalar field. I think you may have meant |\partial \phi|^{2}=(\partial^{\mu}\phi^{*})(\partial_{\mu}\phi). Anyways, (1) and (3) are equivalent as long as you remember that these quantities appear in an integral, so that \int d^{4}x (\partial^{\mu}\phi)(\partial_{\mu}\phi)=-\int d^{4}x\, \phi \partial^{\mu}\partial_{\mu}\phi. This means that the action for a real scalar field can be written as S=\frac{1}{2}\int d^{4}x\, [(\partial \phi)^{2}-m^{2}\phi^{2}]=-\frac{1}{2}\int d^{4}x \, \phi(\partial^{2}+m^{2})\phi. (Note \partial^{2}\equiv\partial^{\mu}\partial_{\mu})
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top