Equivalence of differential operator terms in action

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the equivalence of differential operator terms acting on a real field \(\phi\). Three forms are analyzed: (1) \((\partial^\mu \phi)(\partial_\mu \phi)\), (2) \(\partial^\mu \partial_\mu |\phi|^2\), and (3) \(\phi (\partial^\mu \partial_\mu) \phi\). It is established that forms (1) and (3) are equivalent under integration, while form (2) may not accurately represent a charged scalar field. The action for a real scalar field is expressed as \(S=\frac{1}{2}\int d^{4}x\, [(\partial \phi)^{2}-m^{2}\phi^{2}]\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential operators in field theory
  • Familiarity with real scalar fields and their actions
  • Knowledge of integration in four-dimensional spacetime
  • Basic grasp of gradient and Laplacian operators
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of differential operators in quantum field theory
  • Learn about the action principle in classical field theory
  • Explore the implications of scalar fields in particle physics
  • Investigate the role of integration in field equations
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum field theory, graduate students studying particle physics, and researchers analyzing scalar field dynamics.

Mithra
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, I'm sure I'm being very stupid here but I'm reading through notes which contain various actions for fields, most of which are very similar, however there is some discrepancies with the way differential operators are shown acting on the fields and I can't for the life of me work out which are equal to which so any advice would be great.

The three forms I can see are, for a real field \phi

<br /> 1) (∂^\mu \phi)(∂_\mu \phi)<br />

<br /> 2) ∂^\mu ∂_\mu |\phi|^2<br />

<br /> 3) \phi (∂^\mu ∂_\mu) \phi<br />

These seem to often be used in very similar places but I can't really see how they relate? This is likely painfully simple and I'm just overthinking it but even just pointing in the right direction would be great, thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps it is clearer if we just write \partial_\mu \phi as the gradient \nabla\phi. In that case, the three expressions you have written are:
1) (\nabla\phi) \cdot (\nabla\phi)
2) \nabla^2 |\phi|^2
3) (\nabla^2\phi) \phi
where
\nabla \equiv \left(\frac{\partial}{\partial x}, \frac{\partial}{\partial y}, \frac{\partial}{\partial z} \right)
and
\nabla^2 \equiv \nabla \cdot \nabla = \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2} + \frac{\partial^2}{\partial y^2} + \frac{\partial^2}{\partial z^2}

It may also help you if you write out these expressions for a simple example, like \phi(x, y, z) = xyz.
 
I could be wrong, but I think (2) as you've written it doesn't describe a charged scalar field. I think you may have meant |\partial \phi|^{2}=(\partial^{\mu}\phi^{*})(\partial_{\mu}\phi). Anyways, (1) and (3) are equivalent as long as you remember that these quantities appear in an integral, so that \int d^{4}x (\partial^{\mu}\phi)(\partial_{\mu}\phi)=-\int d^{4}x\, \phi \partial^{\mu}\partial_{\mu}\phi. This means that the action for a real scalar field can be written as S=\frac{1}{2}\int d^{4}x\, [(\partial \phi)^{2}-m^{2}\phi^{2}]=-\frac{1}{2}\int d^{4}x \, \phi(\partial^{2}+m^{2})\phi. (Note \partial^{2}\equiv\partial^{\mu}\partial_{\mu})
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K