Equivalence of differential operator terms in action

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 1K views
Mithra
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, I'm sure I'm being very stupid here but I'm reading through notes which contain various actions for fields, most of which are very similar, however there is some discrepancies with the way differential operators are shown acting on the fields and I can't for the life of me work out which are equal to which so any advice would be great.

The three forms I can see are, for a real field [itex]\phi[/itex]

[itex] 1) (∂^\mu \phi)(∂_\mu \phi)[/itex]

[itex] 2) ∂^\mu ∂_\mu |\phi|^2[/itex]

[itex] 3) \phi (∂^\mu ∂_\mu) \phi[/itex]

These seem to often be used in very similar places but I can't really see how they relate? This is likely painfully simple and I'm just overthinking it but even just pointing in the right direction would be great, thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps it is clearer if we just write [itex]\partial_\mu \phi[/itex] as the gradient [itex]\nabla\phi[/itex]. In that case, the three expressions you have written are:
1) [itex](\nabla\phi) \cdot (\nabla\phi)[/itex]
2) [itex]\nabla^2 |\phi|^2[/itex]
3) [itex](\nabla^2\phi) \phi[/itex]
where
[tex]\nabla \equiv \left(\frac{\partial}{\partial x}, \frac{\partial}{\partial y}, \frac{\partial}{\partial z} \right)[/tex]
and
[tex]\nabla^2 \equiv \nabla \cdot \nabla = \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2} + \frac{\partial^2}{\partial y^2} + \frac{\partial^2}{\partial z^2}[/tex]

It may also help you if you write out these expressions for a simple example, like [itex]\phi(x, y, z) = xyz[/itex].
 
I could be wrong, but I think (2) as you've written it doesn't describe a charged scalar field. I think you may have meant [itex]|\partial \phi|^{2}=(\partial^{\mu}\phi^{*})(\partial_{\mu}\phi)[/itex]. Anyways, (1) and (3) are equivalent as long as you remember that these quantities appear in an integral, so that [itex]\int d^{4}x (\partial^{\mu}\phi)(\partial_{\mu}\phi)=-\int d^{4}x\, \phi \partial^{\mu}\partial_{\mu}\phi[/itex]. This means that the action for a real scalar field can be written as [itex]S=\frac{1}{2}\int d^{4}x\, [(\partial \phi)^{2}-m^{2}\phi^{2}]=-\frac{1}{2}\int d^{4}x \, \phi(\partial^{2}+m^{2})\phi[/itex]. (Note [itex]\partial^{2}\equiv\partial^{\mu}\partial_{\mu}[/itex])