I Equivalence of two complex expressions

TheCanadian
Messages
361
Reaction score
13
Screen Shot 2016-10-19 at 11.46.24 PM.png


I found the above while going through my textbook, where the textbook was trying to explain that the principal value of the product of two complex numbers raised to an exponent is not necessarily equivalent to the product of the two complex number each raised to the same exponent first.

Based on the above, what exactly is the difference in the two expressions? Is not ## e^{-i \frac {3\pi}{8}} ## equivalent to ## e^{i \frac {5\pi}{8}} ##?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
TheCanadian said:
Is not ## e^{-i \frac {3\pi}{8}} ## equivalent to ## e^{i \frac {5\pi}{8}} ##?
No, they're not equivalent. They refer to points on a unit circle that diametrically opposite one another.
 
Mark44 said:
No, they're not equivalent. They refer to points on a unit circle that diametrically opposite one another.

Yikes, it's been a long night. For some reason I mistook the 8 in the denominator of the fraction as a 4. Thank you.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top