Error propagation when you take the inverse?

AI Thread Summary
When taking the inverse of a value with an associated error, the percentage error remains consistent. For example, with a voltage of 30 V ± 0.05 V, the inverse is calculated as 1/V, resulting in approximately 0.0333 V^{-1}. The error in this inverse value is also about 0.1667%, translating to an uncertainty of approximately 0.0000556 V^{-1}. The formula for uncertainty in functions of one variable indicates that the error does not change when taking the inverse. For further understanding, Taylor's "An Introduction to Error Analysis" is recommended.
homestar
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Say something is a value +/- .05. What happens when you take the inverse of the value? For example, 30 V +/- .05 V. 1/V...what would the error be?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a math question. 1/(x+y)=1/(x(1+y/x)).=.(1/x)(1-y/x)=1/x-y/x2.

The assumption is|y|<<|x|, .=. means approx =

I'll let you do the arithmetic.
 
When you take the inverse, use % error. That is the same for the inverse as for the original.
 
Sorry, I have the same qns but i don't get what both of you are saying, elaborate with example? thanks
 
In the original question, the error in V is 0.05 V or (0.05/30)*100% = 0.1667%.

1/V = 0.0333 V^{-1}. The error in this is also 0.1667%, or about 0.0000556 V^{-1}.
 
The uncertainty in any function of one variable is \delta y = \left|\frac{dy}{dx}\right| \delta x. If y = x^n (in your case n = -1), then \frac{\delta y}{|y|} = |n| \frac{\delta x}{|x|}. For your case, the error is unchanged.

Taylor's book "An introduction to error analysis" is well worth reading.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...

Similar threads

Back
Top