Estimating Jet Speed Using Sound and Light

AI Thread Summary
To estimate the speed of a jet flying at 10,000m altitude, one can utilize the difference in the speed of sound and light. The observer sees the jet before hearing it due to light traveling faster than sound. By measuring the time delay between seeing the jet and hearing its sound using a stopwatch, one can calculate the jet's speed. The aircraft is confirmed to be traveling at or above Mach 1, indicating it exceeds the speed of sound. A solution requires specific timing data to accurately determine the jet's speed.
DANIELLYMA
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



When a jet plane flies overhead at a high altitude, the sound from the engines can be heard, but the sound seems to come from well behind the aircraft. If you knew the altitude of the jet to be 10,000m, how could you estimate the speed of it? Show this using an example.

Homework Equations



c = 3.00*10^8m/s?

The Attempt at a Solution



I asked my teacher this question, but he told me to think about it. He hinted at using the speed of light, speed of sound, and a stop watch. I tried drawing a diagram showing how the person would see the plane first before hearing the engine. I know sound travels slower than light, but I don't know what to do next.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The aircraft is traveling faster than the speed of the sound. Another good example of this is lightning and thunder. You see the lightning first because the speed of light is faster than the speed of sound (the thunder). In my class of physics 11 we finished that module last week.
 
Johnny Blade said:
The aircraft is traveling faster than the speed of the sound. Another good example of this is lightning and thunder. You see the lightning first because the speed of light is faster than the speed of sound (the thunder). In my class of physics 11 we finished that module last week.

Thanks for the answer, but is there a way to estimate the speed of the jet?
 
Not if there's no more data. The speed is 1 mach or higher.
 
I think it can be figured out because as I previously posted, my teacher hinted at using the speed of sound, speed of light, and a stop watch.
 
Does anyone have a solution?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top