Estimating t Dependency on Proton Separation d

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lisa...
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proton Separation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on estimating the dependency of the overlap tunneling matrix element, t, on the proton separation distance, d, in a hydrogen atom. The wave function is represented as e-r/a0, and the potential due to the protons is expressed as V(L-r). The integral for t is derived, showing that as the distance d decreases, t increases exponentially, while an increase in d results in a decrease in t. The user seeks clarification on whether their reasoning is sufficient or if further analysis is required.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically wave functions and tunneling effects.
  • Familiarity with the hydrogen atom model and its wave functions.
  • Knowledge of integral calculus, particularly in evaluating integrals involving exponential functions.
  • Basic concepts of potential energy in electrostatics, particularly Coulomb's law.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the mathematical properties of the overlap integral in quantum mechanics.
  • Study the behavior of exponential functions in relation to distance and potential energy.
  • Learn about graphical representations of wave functions and their implications in quantum tunneling.
  • Investigate the physical significance of the tunneling matrix element in quantum systems.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those studying atomic interactions and tunneling phenomena in hydrogen-like systems.

Lisa...
Messages
189
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Knowing that the wave function of the hydrogen atom is proportional to e-r/a0, estimate how t depends on the proton proton separation d. I need just to make a drawing of the integrand and make a reasonal approximation using my intuition (no numerical methods allowed to calculat the integral.)


Homework Equations



t is the overlap tunneling matrix element, with t= - <L|VL|R>

with
L= 1s- wavefunction centered on the left proton = psi1s(L-r)
R= 1s- wavefunction centered on the right proton = psi1s(R-r)
( L or R is the position of the left or right proton, r is the position of the electron)

VL= the attractive potential of the left proton on the electron= V(L-r)


The Attempt at a Solution



I just want to know whether my solution would be sufficient to this question, or whether I would need to do some more reasoning/ calculus/ plotting of functions.

t= - <e-(L-r)/a0 | -e2/ (4*pi*e0*(L-r)) | e-(R-r)/a0>
= e2/ (4*pi*e0) * (integral taken over dr) (1/(L-r)) * e-(L-r)/a0 -(R-r)/a0

as d= | L-R |
R= L-d

so plugging that into the above equation for t gives:

t= = e2/ (4*pi*e0) * (integral taken over dr) (1/(L-r)) * e(-L+r)/a0 (-L+d +r)/a0>

When d decreases, the exponent of e gets larger , therefore t gets larger too. When d increases, the exponent of e gets smaller, therefore t gets smaller too.

Is this it? I mean, the question said I needed to draw something and use my intuition, which I obviously did not do to solve this problem, this is just reasoning. What do I need to add?

E.g. do I need to be more specific on the dependency other than 'getting bigger/ getting smaller', but say 'it behaves like an exponentially increasing function/ like a parabolic function etc'?

Thanks in advance! I really appreciate your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please, help me, I keep getting stuck on this and the question is due tomorrow.

Now I have the primitive function as the one in the attachment (with x for 'r', l for 'L' and r for 'R'). I don't know how to go further...
 

Attachments

  • Primitive.jpg
    Primitive.jpg
    3.2 KB · Views: 436

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K