Estimating Theta for Beta Distribution: Method of Moments vs. MLE?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mrkb80
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method Moments
mrkb80
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let X_1,...,X_n be iid with pdf f(x;\theta) = \theta x^{\theta-1} , 0 \le x \le 1 , 0 < \theta < \infty

Find an estimator for \theta by method of moments

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I know I need to align the first moment of the beta distribution with the first moment of the sample (\bar{x} or \dfrac{\Sigma_{i=1}^n x_i}{n})

The beta distribution has a first moment of \dfrac{\alpha}{\alpha + \beta}I guess my problem is figuring out what my should be alpha and beta from the given pdf, from there it is simply just \bar{x}=\dfrac{\alpha}{\alpha + \beta} and then solving for \theta Any advice?

I did try to take the expected value of the pdf and set it equal to x bar, but I think that is not the correct answer ( I got something like \hat{\theta}=\dfrac{\bar{x}}{1-\bar{x}} )

I also attempted this using MLE and got something like \hat{\theta}=\dfrac{-n}{\Sigma_{i=1}^n \ln{x_i}} but I would also like to solve this problem with method of moments.

Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
mrkb80 said:
I know I need to align the first moment of the beta distribution with the first moment of the sample (\bar{x} or \dfrac{\Sigma_{i=1}^n x_i}{n})

The beta distribution has a first moment of \dfrac{\alpha}{\alpha + \beta}


I guess my problem is figuring out what my should be alpha and beta from the given pdf, from there it is simply just \bar{x}=\dfrac{\alpha}{\alpha + \beta} and then solving for \theta Any advice?

I did try to take the expected value of the pdf and set it equal to x bar, but I think that is not the correct answer ( I got something like \hat{\theta}=\dfrac{\bar{x}}{1-\bar{x}} )
If you represent it as a case of a Beta distribution, you get α=θ, β=1, yes? And that gives you the same result as you obtained directly. What makes you think it is wrong?
 
Thanks for the reply.

It just felt wrong to me because it was so far from the MLE estimate, but I know that can happen.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top