Estimating with uncertainty principle

dsdsuster
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
http://quantummechanics.ucsd.edu/ph130a/130_notes/node98.html

Can someone help me understand what's going on here?

He says "The idea is that the radius must be larger than the spread in position, and the momentum must be larger than the spread in momentum." which I suppose must be true in order to have a well-defined position and momentum? And then he uses the uncertainty of the momentum as a substitute for the actual momentum. This part in particular I don't really understand.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it's because the average momentum is 0 (Closed orbit), so the time-average of the momentum squared (Which is what actually enters the equation), is exactly the variance in the expectation value of the momentum.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top