A Euclidean signature and compact gauge group

Click For Summary
When transitioning to Euclidean space via analytic continuation, both the time variable and the gauge field must be transformed to maintain a compact gauge group. This ensures that the representation of the gauge transformation remains unitary and finite-dimensional. The discussion highlights the importance of substituting the proper orthochronous Lorentz group with O(4), converting four-vectors into Euclidean vectors. While specific texts like Ryder's "Quantum Field Theory" may touch on complexification, comprehensive sources on this topic are limited. Understanding this transformation is crucial for preserving the properties of the gauge group in quantum field theory.
Einj
Messages
464
Reaction score
59
Hello everyone,
I have been reading around that when performing the analytic continuation to Euclidean space (t\to-i\tau) one also has to continue the gauge field (A_t\to iA_4) in order to keep the gauge group compact.
I already knew that the gauge field had to be continued as well but I didn't know anything about keeping the gauge group compact. Can someone explain it to me?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe it has to do with keeping the representation of the gauge transformation unitary and finite dimensional.
 
  • Like
Likes Einj
Do you have any idea on how to show it or any source I could look at? Thanks for you reply!
 
I would guess any decent grad text on field theory might cover this. I don't know of one myself. I recall reading something on the complexification in Ryder's book "Quantum Field Theory" but I don't recall him speaking of justification. I don't recall Kaku addressing it directly in his book but I haven't peeked in his text in a while and didn't read it extensively when I last did. Maybe someone else has a suggestion?
 
The point is that you entirely go from Minkowski space with a fundamental form of signature (1,3) (or (3,1) if you come from the east coast ;-)) to Euclidean space, i.e., the proper orthochronous Lorentz group is substituted by O(4). So all four-vectors become Euclidean vectors. The gauge group stays as it is, i.e., a compact Lie group.
 
  • Like
Likes Einj
Oh I see! Thanks a lot
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
First, I need to check that I have the 3 notations correct for an inner product in finite vector spaces over a complex field; v* means: given the isomorphism V to V* then: (a) physicists and others: (u,v)=v*u ; linear in the second argument (b) some mathematicians: (u,v)=u*v; linear in the first argument. (c) bra-ket: <v|u>= (u,v) from (a), so v*u . <v|u> is linear in the second argument. If these are correct, then it would seem that <v|u> being linear in the second...

Similar threads