Eugenol and Eugenol acetate reaction questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter TeenieBopper
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reaction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the reactions of eugenol and eugenol acetate with FeCl3. Participants noted that no visible reaction occurred during their lab, raising questions about the expected outcomes. It was clarified that eugenol contains an -OH group, which can form a color complex with Fe(III), while eugenol acetate lacks this group and thus does not react similarly. The importance of adding a halogen for a reaction with the alkene was emphasized, as the absence of a halogen would prevent any reaction with the double bond. Overall, the conversation highlighted the role of functional groups in determining reactivity with FeCl3.
TeenieBopper
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Complete the following reactions, giving the correct structure for each organic product:
eugenol + FeCl_3 ->

eugenol acetate + FeCl_3 ->


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



When I did this lab, my partner and I didn't notice a reaction when we added FeCl_3 to our eugenol product, but that seems too easy; why would they ask what the product is if there wasn't a reaction.

However, both eugenol and eugenol acetate have an alkene. I learned in lecture that when an alkene reacts with a halogen in the presence of a catalyst (Cl_2 and FeCl_3, respectfully) the double bond becomes a single bond and each side takes one of the halogen atoms. So does the alkene end simply become CClH-2-CClH_2 for both eugenol and eugenol acetate?

Any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TeenieBopper said:
When I did this lab, my partner and I didn't notice a reaction when we added FeCl_3 to our eugenol product, but that seems too easy; why would they ask what the product is if there wasn't a reaction.

Not good, in theory you should observe a color change.

I learned in lecture that when an alkene reacts with a halogen in the presence of a catalyst (Cl_2 and FeCl_3, respectfully)

And you added a halogen?
 
Borek said:
Not good, in theory you should observe a color change.

Well, the solution with the eugenol products was clear, and the FeCl_3 was yellow, and when we mixed the two, the solution was yellow. I just assumed that it was because of the FeCl_3.
And you added a halogen?

Yeah, this was why I was confused, because we didn't explicitly add a halogen.

I did some more reading, and I found something about Fe reacting and creating complexes with OH groups. Would the product for for Eugenol + FeCl_3 essentially be six pointed star with Fe at the center, bonded with the O from the OH group from the eugenol? And then, because eugenol acetate doesn't have any OH groups, it doesn't react with the FeCl_3?
 
TeenieBopper said:
Yeah, this was why I was confused, because we didn't explicitly add a halogen.

So if you didn't add the halogen, it couldn't react with a double bond.

I did some more reading, and I found something about Fe reacting and creating complexes with OH groups. Would the product for for Eugenol + FeCl_3 essentially be six pointed star with Fe at the center, bonded with the O from the OH group from the eugenol? And then, because eugenol acetate doesn't have any OH groups, it doesn't react with the FeCl_3?

You are on the right track. Fe(III) should react with phenolic -OH creating a color complex. From what I read, in the case of eugenol color doesn't have to be stable.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top