I Euler-Lagrange Equation Q: Where Does 2mr˙r˙θ Come From?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter volican
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    euler-lagrange
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Volican, :welcome:

It comes from the time derivative of ##\partial {\mathcal L}\over \partial \dot\theta## $${\partial {\mathcal L}\over \partial \dot\theta }= mr^2\dot \theta $$
 
Thanks for writting back, much appreciated. I can see where that comes from and also the -mgrsinθ but can't see how they got the 2mr˙r˙θ. Any ideas? I am thinking that I can just completley ignore the dr/dt as it is not in the euler lagrange equation? Is this wrong?
 
$$
{d\over dt} \left ( {\partial {\mathcal L}\over \partial \dot\theta } \right ) = {d\over dt} mr^2\dot \theta = m {d\over dt} \left ( r^2\right ) \dot \theta + mr^2 {d\over dt} \dot \theta = 2mr\dot r\dot\theta + mr^2\ddot\theta$$
 
Aewsome! to differentiate r^2 did you use the chain rule?
 
Yes, the chain rule is awesome :smile: $$
{d\over dt} r^2 = {d\over dt} \left ( r \right ) r + r {d\over dt} \left ( r \right ) = 2 r\dot r $$

Make sure you speak this jargon fluently when pursuing further studies !
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top