MHB Evaluate the sum of the reciprocals

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around evaluating the sum of the reciprocals of four variables, given specific conditions: their sum is zero, their product is one, and the sum of their cubes is 1983. Participants express appreciation for the collaborative problem-solving approach, highlighting similarities in their methods. The focus remains on deriving the value of the expression based on the provided equations. The challenge emphasizes the importance of understanding polynomial relationships and symmetric sums. Ultimately, the goal is to find a solution that satisfies all given conditions.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Given

$p+q+r+s=0$

$pqrs=1$

$p^3+q^3+r^3+s^3=1983$

Evaluate $\dfrac{1}{p}+\dfrac{1}{q}+\dfrac{1}{r}+\dfrac{1}{s}$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Given

$p+q+r+s=0$

$pqrs=1$

$p^3+q^3+r^3+s^3=1983$

Evaluate $\dfrac{1}{p}+\dfrac{1}{q}+\dfrac{1}{r}+\dfrac{1}{s}$.

Hello.

\dfrac{1}{p}+\dfrac{1}{q}+\dfrac{1}{r}+\dfrac{1}{s}=

=qrs+prs+pqs+pqr=

=qrs+prs+rrs+srs-rrs-srs+pqs+pqr=

=-rrs-srs+pqs+pqr, (*)

(p+q)^3=-(r+s)^3

p^3+3p^2q+3pq^2+q^3=-r^3-3r^2s-3rs^2-s^3

1983+3p^2q+3pq^2=-3r^2s-3rs^2

661+p^2q+pq^2=-r^2s-rs^2, (**)

For (*) and (**):

\dfrac{1}{p}+\dfrac{1}{q}+\dfrac{1}{r}+\dfrac{1}{s}=

=661+p^2q+pq^2+pqs+pqr=

=661+pq(p+q+s+r)=661

Regards.
 
I would first combine terms in the expression we are asked to evaluate:

$$\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{q}+\frac{1}{r}+\frac{1}{s}= \frac{qrs+prs+pqs+pqr}{pqrs}$$

Since $$pqrs=1$$, we may write:

$$\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{q}+\frac{1}{r}+\frac{1}{s}=qrs+prs+pqs+pqr$$

Next, take the first given equation and cube it to obtain:

$$(p+q+r+s)^3=0$$

This may be expanded and arranged as:

$$-2\left(p^3+q^3+r^3+s^3 \right)+ 6(qrs+prs+pqs+pqr)+ 3(p+q+r+s)\left(p^2+q^2+r^2+s^2 \right)=0$$

Since $p+q+r+s=0$ and $p^3+q^3+r^3+s^3=1983$, we obtain:

$$-2\cdot1983+6\left(qrs+prs+pqs+pqr \right)=0$$

$$qrs+prs+pqs+pqr=\frac{1983}{3}=661$$

And so we may therefore conclude:

$$\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{q}+\frac{1}{r}+\frac{1}{s}=661$$
 
anemone said:
Given

$p+q+r+s=0$

$pqrs=1$

$p^3+q^3+r^3+s^3=1983$

Evaluate $\dfrac{1}{p}+\dfrac{1}{q}+\dfrac{1}{r}+\dfrac{1}{s}$.

Now that I have just explored Newton's Identities, this is fun. ;)

Let's define $Σ$ such that $Σp^3 = p^3+q^3+r^3+s^3$.
And for instance $Σpqr = pqr + pqs + prs + qrs$.

Then from Newton's Identies we have:
$$Σp^3 = ΣpΣp^2 - ΣpqΣp + 3Σpqr$$
Since $Σp = 0$, this simplifies to:
$$Σp^3 = 3Σpqr = 1983$$
Therefore:
$$Σpqr = 661$$

Since $pqrs=1$, we get by multiplying with $pqrs$:
$$\dfrac{1}{p}+\dfrac{1}{q}+\dfrac{1}{r}+\dfrac{1}{s} = Σpqr = 661 \qquad \blacksquare$$
 
$\displaystyle \frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{q}+\frac{1}{r}+\frac{1}{s} = \frac{pqrs}{p}+\frac{pqrs}{q}+\frac{rspq}{r}+\frac{pqrs}{s}$ (using $pqrs = 1$)

So $\displaystyle \frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{q}+\frac{1}{r}+\frac{1}{s} = \left(pqr+qrs+rsp+spq\right)$

Given $p+q+r+s = 0\Rightarrow (p+q)^3 = -(r+s)^3\Rightarrow p^3+q^3+3pq(p+q) = r^3+s^3+3rs(r+s)$

again using $p+q=-(r+s)$ and $(r+s) = -(p+q)$

So we get $p^3+q^3+r^3+s^3 = 3\left(pqr+qrs+rsp+spq\right)$

Given $1983 = 3\left(pqr+qrs+rsp+spq\right)$

So $\displaystyle \frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{q}+\frac{1}{r}+\frac{1}{s} = \left(pqr+qrs+rsp+spq\right) = \frac{1983}{3} = 661$
 
Thanks to mente oscura, MarkFL, I like Serena and jacks for participating and it feels so great to receive so many replies to my challenge problem and my way of attacking it is exactly the same as jacks's solution.:o
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top