Evaluate this limit with square roots

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the limit as \( x \) approaches 0 for the expression \( \frac{\sqrt{x+1} - \sqrt{2x+1}}{\sqrt{3x + 4} - \sqrt{2x+4}} \). Participants explore various methods to tackle this limit, including rationalization and L'Hopital's Rule.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using the conjugate to rationalize the denominator and express concerns about the complexity of the resulting expressions. Some suggest applying L'Hopital's Rule, while others question the application of the Power Rule in simplifications. There are also discussions about the asymptotic behavior of the functions involved.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of different approaches, with some participants successfully applying L'Hopital's Rule, while others are still grappling with the algebraic manipulations. Guidance has been offered regarding the use of asymptotic expansions and the importance of correctly applying derivatives.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about their understanding of derivatives and the application of the chain rule, indicating a potential gap in foundational knowledge. The discussion reflects a mix of confidence and confusion regarding the methods being employed.

aeromat
Messages
113
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



[tex]$<br /> \lim_{x\to0}\frac{\sqrt{x+1} - \sqrt{2x+1}}{\sqrt{3x + 4} - \sqrt{2x+4}}[/tex]



The Attempt at a Solution


Ok, I just want to know what is the easiest approach tactic one could take to solve this. I tried doing the conjugate to rationalize the denominator, but then I am left with a gigantic numerator on to the top with many square root multiples.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aeromat said:

Homework Statement



[tex]$<br /> \lim_{x\to0}\frac{\sqrt{x+1} - \sqrt{2x+1}}{\sqrt{3x + 4} - \sqrt{2x+4}}[/tex]



The Attempt at a Solution


Ok, I just want to know what is the easiest approach tactic one could take to solve this. I tried doing the conjugate to rationalize the denominator, but then I am left with a gigantic numerator on to the top with many square root multiples.
You could use L'Hopital's Rule on this one. Have you tried that?
 
rationalize to a sum of squares
 
flyingpig said:
rationalize to a sum of squares
I think you mean "difference of squares."
 
Yes that one lol
 
Ok what if I haven't learned L'Hopital's rule, what strategy could I take?
 
Ok nevermind, I am trying to use the L'Hopital's Rule:

If I want to express [tex]f(x) = \sqrt{x+1} - \sqrt{2x+1}[/tex] using the Power Rule, how would I simplify it with the "-1/2" exponent?
 
It would be an exponent of +1/2, not -1/2.

f(x) = (x + 1)1/2 - (2x - 1)1/2

Is that what you're asking?
 
L'Hopital's Rule worked for me - I was able to get a number for this limit. Multiplying numerator and denominator by the conjugate of the denominator did not work for me, as the resulting expression is still in the indeterminate form [0/0].
 
  • #10
Wait, why would it not be -1/2? When you apply the Power Rule, you do n-1 for the exponent, and in this case it was 1/2. So 1/2 - 1 should be -1/2, wouldn't it be?
 
  • #11
Hint:

[tex] (1 + x)^{\alpha} \sim 1 + \alpha x, \; x \rightarrow 0[/tex]

With this formula, you can find the asymptotic behavior of the numerator and denominator. I'll do one for you:

[tex] \sqrt{3 x + 4} = \left[4 \left(1 + \frac{3 x}{4}\right)\right]^{\frac{1}{2}} \sim 2 \, \left(1 + \frac{1}{2} \, \frac{3 x}{4}\right) = 2 + \frac{3 x}{4}[/tex]

and so on. You will see the leading terms will cancel separately in the numerator and the denominator. That is why you need to go to next to leading order. Then, you will see a nice cancellation.
 
  • #12
When you rationalize at the first stage you multiply numerator and denominator by sqrt(3x+4)+sqrt(2x+4), yes? That gives you x in the denominator and it's still 0/0. That's ok, but you don't need to leave the complicated sqrt(3x+4)+sqrt(2x+4) in the numerator. You know that limit is 4. Just multiply the numerator by 4. Now use the same strategy when you rationalize the numerator. Keep things whose limits are nonzero constants as constants until you need to expand them. It doesn't have to be a sqrt nightmare.
 
  • #13
Mark44 said:
It would be an exponent of +1/2, not -1/2.

f(x) = (x + 1)1/2 - (2x - 1)1/2

Is that what you're asking?

aeromat said:
Wait, why would it not be -1/2? When you apply the Power Rule, you do n-1 for the exponent, and in this case it was 1/2. So 1/2 - 1 should be -1/2, wouldn't it be?

f(x) above is the numerator of your expression before applying L'Hopital's Rule. After applying this rule the numerator is f'(x) = (1/2)(x + 1)-1/2 - (2/2)(2x - 1)-1/2.

The question you asked in post #7 was unclear to me, which is why I asked for clarification on what you were trying to say.
 
  • #14
1/(2√[x+1]) - 1/(2√[2x+1])
---------------------------------
1/2(√[3x+4]) - 1/2(√[2x+4])

That is what I got after taking the derivative of both. Now I am stuck, because if I were to plug in x, I get a 0/0 indeterminate form again.
 
  • #15
You have not used the chain rule correctly.

For example,
[tex]\frac{d}{dx} (2x + 1)^{1/2} = \frac{2}{2(2x + 1)^{1/2}}= \frac{1}{(2x + 1)^{1/2}}[/tex]

You have mistakes in three of your derivatives.
 
  • #16
Mark44 said:
You have not used the chain rule correctly.

For example,
[tex]\frac{d}{dx} (2x + 1)^{1/2} = \frac{2}{2(2x + 1)^{1/2}}= \frac{1}{(2x + 1)^{1/2}}[/tex]

You have mistakes in three of your derivatives.

Thank you very much. I finally got the answer, -2.
 
  • #17
aeromat said:
Thank you very much. I finally got the answer, -2.

Yep, that's what I got. Good job!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K