Evaluating a sum involving binomial coefficients

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on evaluating the double sum involving binomial coefficients, specifically the expression $$\mathop{\sum \sum}_{0\leq i PREREQUISITES

  • Understanding of binomial coefficients, specifically ${n\choose k}$.
  • Familiarity with double summation notation and limits.
  • Knowledge of the binomial theorem and its applications.
  • Basic combinatorial identities and their proofs.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of binomial coefficients and their symmetric properties.
  • Learn about the binomial theorem and its implications in combinatorial proofs.
  • Explore advanced summation techniques, including generating functions.
  • Investigate the derivation and applications of the formula for the sum of squares of binomial coefficients.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, combinatorialists, and students studying advanced combinatorial identities and summation techniques.

Saitama
Messages
4,244
Reaction score
93
Problem:
Evaluate
$$\mathop{\sum \sum}_{0\leq i<j\leq n} (-1)^{i-j+1}{n\choose i}{n\choose j}$$

Attempt:
I wrote the sum as:
$$\sum_{j=1}^{n} \sum_{i=0}^{j-1} (-1)^{i-j+1}{n\choose i}{n\choose j}$$
I am not sure how to proceed from here. I tried writing down a few terms but that doesn't seem to help.

Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
To me, the innermost sum looks like a binomial expansion...
 
Prove It said:
To me, the innermost sum looks like a binomial expansion...

I don't think so...(Wondering)

The sum is
$$-\sum_{j=1}^{n} (-1)^i{n\choose i} \sum_{i=0}^{j-1} (-1)^j {n\choose j}$$
The limits for innermost sum varies from 0 to j-1, not 0 to n.
 
Pranav said:
Problem:
Evaluate
$$\mathop{\sum \sum}_{0\leq i<j\leq n} (-1)^{i-j+1}{n\choose i}{n\choose j}$$
First, $(-1)^{-j} = (-1)^{\,j}$, so we can write the sum as $$S = \mathop{\sum \sum}_{0\leqslant i<j\leqslant n} (-1)^{i+j+1}{n\choose i}{n\choose j}$$. The summand is then symmetric in $i$ and $j$, so the sum $S$ is equal to $$ \mathop{\sum \sum}_{0\leqslant j<i\leqslant n} (-1)^{i+j+1}{n\choose i}{n\choose j}$$ (with $i$ and $j$ interchanged). If we now add those two sums, and also throw in the diagonal terms (those with $i=j$ in the summand, namely $$ \sum_{i=0}^n -{n\choose i}^2$$), then we would get the sum over the whole $n\times n$ array of indices $\{(i,j): 1\leqslant i \leqslant n,\; 1 \leqslant j \leqslant n\}$. But that sum is $$-\sum_{i=0}^n (-1)^i{n\choose i} \sum_{j=0}^n (-1)^j{n\choose j}$$. And $$\sum_{i=0}^n (-1)^i{n\choose i} = 0$$, because it is the binomial expansion of $(1-1)^n$.

It follows that $$2S - \sum_{i=0}^n {n\choose i}^2 = 0$$, and so $$S = \frac12\sum_{i=0}^n {n\choose i}^2 = \frac{(2n)!}{2(n!)^2}$$ (see formula (9) here for the sum of the squares of binomial coefficients $n\choose i$).
 
Opalg said:
First, $(-1)^{-j} = (-1)^{\,j}$, so we can write the sum as $$S = \mathop{\sum \sum}_{0\leqslant i<j\leqslant n} (-1)^{i+j+1}{n\choose i}{n\choose j}$$. The summand is then symmetric in $i$ and $j$, so the sum $S$ is equal to $$ \mathop{\sum \sum}_{0\leqslant j<i\leqslant n} (-1)^{i+j+1}{n\choose i}{n\choose j}$$ (with $i$ and $j$ interchanged). If we now add those two sums, and also throw in the diagonal terms (those with $i=j$ in the summand, namely $$ \sum_{i=0}^n -{n\choose i}^2$$), then we would get the sum over the whole $n\times n$ array of indices $\{(i,j): 1\leqslant i \leqslant n,\; 1 \leqslant j \leqslant n\}$. But that sum is $$-\sum_{i=0}^n (-1)^i{n\choose i} \sum_{j=0}^n (-1)^j{n\choose j}$$. And $$\sum_{i=0}^n (-1)^i{n\choose i} = 0$$, because it is the binomial expansion of $(1-1)^n$.

It follows that $$2S - \sum_{i=0}^n {n\choose i}^2 = 0$$, and so $$S = \frac12\sum_{i=0}^n {n\choose i}^2 = \frac{(2n)!}{2(n!)^2}$$ (see formula (9) here for the sum of the squares of binomial coefficients $n\choose i$).

This is great, thank you Opalg! :) (Bow)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K