Evaluating Hermite Identity with Integers: Help with Homework Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter rattanjot14
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on evaluating a sum involving integers a, b, and m, specifically the expression related to the Hermite identity. The user attempted to apply the identity but faced difficulties due to the non-integer nature of a/m. References to "Concrete Mathematics" highlight the importance of the greatest common divisor (gcd) of a and m in determining the result. Additionally, integrals related to the problem are mentioned, suggesting a deeper mathematical connection. The conversation encourages further attempts and sharing of methods to solve the equation.
rattanjot14
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let a and b be integers and m an integer >1 Evaluate

[b/m] + [(b+a)/m]+ [(b+2a)/m]+ [(b+3a)/m]+ [(b+4a)/m]+ [(b+5a)/m]+...+ [(b+(m-1)a)/m]

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


i tried to use hermite identity.

[x] + [x + 1/n] + [x + 2/n] +...+ [x + (n-1)/n] = [nx]

assuming x = b/m and 1/n = a/m.. but a/m is not an integer so i can't use it. I m stuck what to do?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Funny you should mention that, just last week I read about it in pp 90-94 of Concrete Mathematics by Ronald L. Graham , Donald E. Knuth, and Oren Patashnik. Several interesting things are the dependence of the result on gcd(a,m) ,the fact that

$$\sum_{0 \le k < m} \left[ \frac{b+k \, a}{m}\right] = \sum_{0 \le k < a} \left[ \frac{b+k \, m}{a}\right], \, \, \, \, \, \, \, \, \, \mathop{integers \, \, \, a,m>0} $$

the closely related integrals

$$\frac{1}{m} \int_0^m (a \, x+b) \! \mathop{dx}=\frac{1}{a} \int_0^a (m \, x+b) \! \mathop{dx}=\frac{a \, m}{2}+b$$

The book uses several special cases to deduce the general one. Give it another try. If you have trouble describe the methods you tried and those you have know.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...

Similar threads

Back
Top