Evaluating Limit: [(1/x+4)-1/4]/x

  • Thread starter Thread starter Johnnycab
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the limit of the expression \([(1/x+4)-1/4]/x\) as \(x\) approaches 0. Participants are exploring algebraic manipulations and clarifying the interpretation of the expression.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the process of finding a common denominator and whether it needs to be the least common denominator (LCD). There are attempts to clarify the correct interpretation of the expression and the steps involved in simplifying it. Some participants express confusion about the algebraic manipulations and the limit process.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the algebraic steps needed to evaluate the limit. Some participants have provided guidance on the manipulation of the expression, while others are still seeking clarity on specific steps and interpretations. Multiple interpretations of the original expression are being considered.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating potential ambiguities in the notation used in the limit expression, which affects the interpretation and subsequent calculations. There is also mention of confusion regarding the algebraic steps taken to simplify the expression.

Johnnycab
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Im asked to evaluate:

[(1/x+4)-1/4]/x
Lim -> 0

Substitution, factoring and conjugate multiplication don't work

The question tells me to multipy the top and bottam by the lcd of the little fractions namely 4(x+4)

--here I am a little confused, did all the book do is take both denominators (x+4) and 4 and make them the LCD together?

So like if my question was for example like this,

[(1/2x+3)-1/4]/x

My LCD would be 4(2x+3), am i wrong?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, that's right. To be honest, you are OK just putting them over a common denominator... it doesn't strictly speaking have to be the LCD.

That is, if you had:

[(1/2x+4)-1/4]/x

Your LCD would be 4(x+2), but you could solve the problem just fine if you multiplied the numerator and denominator by 4(2x+4).
 
thanks

ok i understand multiplying the numerator and denominator by 4(x+4),and to find a LCD but the next steps are just a little confusing

lim x->0
(1)[(1/x+4)-1/4]/x

(2) [(1/x+4)-1/4]/x
x
4(x+4)
4(x+4)
=
(3) [4-(x-4)]/[4x(+4)]
=
(4) -x/[4x(x+4)]
=
(5) -1/[4x(x4)]

Now i can substitute

Im sorry if this doesn't make sense but I am not understanding this way of solving limits. I broke it into the 5 steps, can this way be described in a step process?

Thanks
 
Generally, you seem to be doing the right thing, although it's hard to see because of your insistance on using "x" for both the variable and the multiplication operator! :smile:

But yes, the general idea is you do some algebraic manipulations (in as many steps as you need!) until you get to an expression that you know how to take the limit of directly.
 
By [(1/x+4)-1/4]/x
Lim -> 0

Do you mean [1/(x+4)- 1/4]/x or do you mean [(1/x)+ 4- 1/4]/x. What you wrote should be strictly interpreted as the latter but that does not converge as x goes to 0. The former is the same as
[tex]\frac{\frac{4}{4(x+4)}-\frac{x+4}{4(x+4)}}{x}= \frac{-1}{4(x+4)}[/tex]
and the limit of that should be easy.
 
HallsofIvy said:
By [(1/x+4)-1/4]/x
Lim -> 0

Do you mean [1/(x+4)- 1/4]/x or do you mean [(1/x)+ 4- 1/4]/x. What you wrote should be strictly interpreted as the latter but that does not converge as x goes to 0. The former is the same as
[tex]\frac{\frac{4}{4(x+4)}-\frac{x+4}{4(x+4)}}{x}= \frac{-1}{4(x+4)}[/tex]
and the limit of that should be easy.

Yes i mean [1/(x+4)- 1/4]/x

I see this equation solved out, but I am not understanding it

Like after i find out that the LCD of the simple fractions in the numerator is[4(x-4)], what happened at steps 3 to 5?
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K